Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 76 documents that match your query. These 76 documents contain a total of 1,820 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 31 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 30 different engine manufacturers
- 112 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 39 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.845%
- 426 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.772%
- 9 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.153%
- 216 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.121%
- 6 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.677%
- 341 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.437%
- 358 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.689%
- 424 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.875%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 1 of 76
| Test Id: | 8 |
|---|---|
| Title: | A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine |
| File Size: | 33.744 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Date: | 17-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing -1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing 11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing 11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing 29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing 91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing 57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 2 of 76
| Test Id: | 69 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Alaska Railroad Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 72.735 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Nov-1995 |
| Test Date: | 16-Sep-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing -13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 3 of 76
| Test Id: | 78 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Andhra Pradesh |
| File Size: | 9.721 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 28-Oct-1994 |
| Test Location: | Andhra Pradesh, India |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing 10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing 18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 4 of 76
| Test Id: | 70 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel |
| File Size: | 16.072 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Jul-1985 |
| Test Date: | 20-Feb-1985 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 5 of 76
| Test Id: | 79 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BEC-allwaste |
| File Size: | 22.693 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Sep-1996 |
| Test Date: | 10-Jul-1996 |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing 0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing -3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing 17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing -1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing 14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing 11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing 10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing 14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing 42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing 29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing 19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing 29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing 36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 6 of 76
| Test Id: | 14 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station |
| File Size: | 13.352 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1992 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing -45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing -10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing 7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing 38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 7 of 76
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 8 of 76
| Test Id: | 27 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Cascade Corporation |
| File Size: | 12.213 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 3-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing |
Result 9 of 76
| Test Id: | 81 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Urban Stages |
| File Size: | 6.812 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing 5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing -2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing 52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing 0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 10 of 76
| Test Id: | 82 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Brambles Trucking |
| File Size: | 0.488 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Feb-1992 |
| Test Date: | 14-Nov-1991 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing 23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing 20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 11 of 76
| Test Id: | 83 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Broward County Schools |
| File Size: | 14.875 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 4-Apr-1995 |
| Test Date: | 28-Oct-1994 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins B engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 3 Navistar 444 engines via CO testing 19.6% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO testing -9.4% average improvement on 2 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via CO2 testing 1.9% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO2 testing 4.2% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO2 testing -18.2% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via HC testing 7.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via HC testing 15.5% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via HC testing -36.5% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via HC testing 13.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.3% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 12 of 76
| Test Id: | 187 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway |
| File Size: | 26.822 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-2000 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing 43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing 11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 13 of 76
| Test Id: | 41 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Norsman |
| File Size: | 0.095 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-2004 |
| Test Date: | 21-Apr-2004 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 14 of 76
| Test Id: | 84 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Charley Brothers |
| File Size: | 14.550 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1989 |
| Test Date: | 13-Apr-1989 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.8% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.6% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -69.5% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via HC testing -85.7% improvement on a Navistar 444 engine via HC testing |
Result 15 of 76
| Test Id: | 85 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Cheran Transport |
| File Size: | 24.740 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Jun-1994 |
| Test Date: | 11-Feb-1994 |
| Test Location: | Tamil Nadu, India |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.5% average improvement on 9 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 18.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 6-65 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.9% improvement on a Viking BW engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via CO2 testing 2.5% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing -12.6% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing 20.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via HC testing 10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing 35.0% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 16 of 76
| Test Id: | 161 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Gatlinburg
|
| File Size: | 4.200 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Aug-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -2.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO2 testing 25.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via HC testing |
Result 17 of 76
| Test Id: | 88 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Southaven |
| File Size: | 0.774 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 28-Dec-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Mississippi, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.7% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -45.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO testing 92.7% average improvement on 2 Isuzu Pickup engines via CO testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO2 testing 7.1% improvement on a Ford Ambulance engine via CO2 testing -1.1% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via CO2 testing -21.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 60.1% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via HC testing 58.9% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via HC testing |
Result 18 of 76
| Test Id: | 89 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Coca-Cola Bottling |
| File Size: | 18.379 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 11-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 11-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing 0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing 17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 19 of 76
| Test Id: | 12 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Cominco Alaska Red Dog Mine Powerhouse |
| File Size: | 73.385 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Feb-1995 |
| Test Date: | 18-Jan-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.1% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 9.0% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO2 testing 13.6% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via HC testing 20.0% improvement on a Wartsila 16V32 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 20 of 76
| Test Id: | 17 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans |
| File Size: | 5.262 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 21 of 76
| Test Id: | 90 |
|---|---|
| Title: | David A. Tesone Enterprises
|
| File Size: | 8.680 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Jun-1987 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 22 of 76
| Test Id: | 18 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Devall Diesel |
| File Size: | 5.236 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 |
| Test Date: | 5-Jun-2000 |
| Test Location: | Louisiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing -28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 23 of 76
| Test Id: | 92 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Distribution Trucking Company |
| File Size: | 9.884 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Jan-1994 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing -5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing 9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing 9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing 13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing 18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing 7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 24 of 76
| Test Id: | 44 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Dominion Mining |
| File Size: | 12.589 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 27-May-1994 |
| Test Date: | 30-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 25 of 76
| Test Id: | 211 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Echo Bay Mining |
| File Size: | 22.349 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 29-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Nevada, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 26 of 76
| Test Id: | 93 |
|---|---|
| Title: | EG&G Idaho |
| File Size: | 7.940 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 27 of 76
| Test Id: | 94 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC, Dry Valley Mine |
| File Size: | 3.820 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 28 of 76
| Test Id: | 95 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC, Skull Point Field Trial |
| File Size: | 28.206 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Jun-1994 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing |
Result 29 of 76
| Test Id: | 120 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Gainsville |
| File Size: | 0.028 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Aug-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 6.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 41.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing |
Result 30 of 76
| Test Id: | 72 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Geneva Steel |
| File Size: | 7.723 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Feb-1999 |
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1997 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing -8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing 11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 31 of 76
| Test Id: | 96 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Golden Gem Growers |
| File Size: | 9.576 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Feb-1991 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via CO2 testing 42.5% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via HC testing |
Result 32 of 76
| Test Id: | 154 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Greyhound Lines , INC |
| File Size: | 34.897 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | 1-Jan-1983 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.1% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO testing 100.0% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO testing 9.1% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO2 testing 92.2% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via HC testing 88.8% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via HC testing |
Result 33 of 76
| Test Id: | 137 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Greyhound Lines, Florida |
| File Size: | 6.244 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Jan-1986 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jan-1983 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 92.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO testing 9.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO2 testing 94.0% improvement on a Detroit V871 engine via HC testing |
Result 34 of 76
| Test Id: | 98 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Gujarat |
| File Size: | 21.654 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Jun-1994 |
| Test Date: | 11-Feb-1992 |
| Test Location: | Gujarat, India |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.9% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.3% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via CO2 testing -0.8% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing -4.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing 17.3% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via HC testing 10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing 33.0% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Smoke Spot testing 43.0% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 35 of 76
| Test Id: | 99 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Hillsborough County School |
| File Size: | 46.021 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 11-Aug-1994 |
| Test Date: | 5-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.9% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO testing 20.9% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO testing 16.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO2 testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO2 testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via HC testing -22.4% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via HC testing 11.6% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Smoke Spot testing 41.0% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a International DT466 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 36 of 76
| Test Id: | 73 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad |
| File Size: | 15.412 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Sep-1997 |
| Test Date: | 4-Aug-1997 |
| Test Location: | Indiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.6% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO testing 59.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO testing -18.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO testing 9.7% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO2 testing 6.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 34.5% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via HC testing 53.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via HC testing 50.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing |
Result 37 of 76
| Test Id: | 164 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Industrial Waste Services
|
| File Size: | 3.543 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Jul-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 19.0% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 19.0% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 7.6% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO2 testing 29.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 29.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via HC testing |
Result 38 of 76
| Test Id: | 24 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Interlink Express |
| File Size: | 9.470 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 14-Dec-1995 |
| Test Date: | 19-Jul-1995 |
| Test Location: | England, England |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 39 of 76
| Test Id: | 100 |
|---|---|
| Title: | J.R.C. Enterprises |
| File Size: | 7.130 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1983 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jul-1983 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7011 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO testing 9.3% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO2 testing 41.2% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via HC testing |
Result 40 of 76
| Test Id: | 101 |
|---|---|
| Title: | JBP Companies |
| File Size: | 0.424 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Apr-1992 |
| Test Date: | 20-Jan-1992 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 41 of 76
| Test Id: | 142 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Jelco Buses |
| File Size: | 10.387 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Mar-1988 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jan-1988 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing -19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing |
Result 42 of 76
| Test Id: | 49 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Kennecott Copper |
| File Size: | 26.441 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Apr-1995 |
| Test Date: | 27-Feb-1995 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 43 of 76
| Test Id: | 103 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Knoxville Transportation |
| File Size: | 7.635 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Jun-1985 |
| Test Date: | 12-Nov-1984 |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.9% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing |
Result 44 of 76
| Test Id: | 104 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Laidlaw Bus |
| File Size: | 13.087 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-May-1996 |
| Test Date: | 27-Mar-1996 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing 23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing 6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing 30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing -0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing 18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing 45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 45 of 76
| Test Id: | 105 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Lusk |
| File Size: | 21.380 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Date: | 20-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing 20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing 56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 46 of 76
| Test Id: | 68 |
|---|---|
| Title: | M.S.Conus |
| File Size: | 3.148 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing |
Result 47 of 76
| Test Id: | 51 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Magma Copper |
| File Size: | 21.964 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-May-1994 |
| Test Date: | 14-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing 12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing 21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 48 of 76
| Test Id: | 107 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Memphis Cablevision |
| File Size: | 0.655 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 27-Dec-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 11.8% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 17.4% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via CO2 testing 12.4% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via HC testing 29.6% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via HC testing |
Result 49 of 76
| Test Id: | 108 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Neff Trucking |
| File Size: | 12.954 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 7-Jun-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jul-1987 |
| Test Location: | Ohio, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 10.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 50 of 76
| Test Id: | 64 |
|---|---|
| Title: | North Flinders
|
| File Size: | 0.165 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1989 |
| Test Date: | 6-May-1989 |
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 51 of 76
| Test Id: | 53 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Occidental Chemical |
| File Size: | 0.038 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing |
Result 52 of 76
| Test Id: | 157 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Peak Downs mine |
| File Size: | 7.699 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-1991 |
| Test Date: | 28-Aug-1990 |
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing 43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing 33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 53 of 76
| Test Id: | 133 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Perugia Italy |
| File Size: | 0.029 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.3% average improvement on 3 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.8% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO testing 0.2% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO2 testing |
Result 54 of 76
| Test Id: | 110 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Pierce Trucking |
| File Size: | 5.133 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 9-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Oct-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 55 of 76
| Test Id: | 26 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Provo City |
| File Size: | 51.613 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 12-Sep-1995 |
| Test Date: | 12-Jun-1995 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing -19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing 22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing 3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing 32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing 5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing 33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing 21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 56 of 76
| Test Id: | 65 |
|---|---|
| Title: | RedBank Power
|
| File Size: | 0.228 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1983 |
| Test Date: | 12-Oct-1983 |
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing 4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing |
Result 57 of 76
| Test Id: | 136 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
| File Size: | 3.684 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 58 of 76
| Test Id: | 222 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Royal Caribbean |
| File Size: | 4.725 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 14-May-2012 |
| Test Date: | 8-Apr-2012 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 59 of 76
| Test Id: | 58 |
|---|---|
| Title: | San Juan Coal |
| File Size: | 3.470 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
| Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 60 of 76
| Test Id: | 47 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
| File Size: | 7.162 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 61 of 76
| Test Id: | 112 |
|---|---|
| Title: | T.G. Lee Foods, Inc |
| File Size: | 13.442 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Oct-1995 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1995 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing 16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing 8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 62 of 76
| Test Id: | 2 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco)
|
| File Size: | 7.716 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Sep-1988 |
| Test Date: | 7-Jul-1988 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing 8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing 31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing |
Result 63 of 76
| Test Id: | 113 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Three Rivers Ice Cream |
| File Size: | 6.057 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Aug-1988 |
| Test Date: | 25-May-1988 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.8% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO testing 13.2% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 22.6% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via HC testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via HC testing |
Result 64 of 76
| Test Id: | 16 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Tidewater Marine |
| File Size: | 19.169 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 17-Aug-1982 |
| Test Date: | 23-Jul-1982 |
| Test Location: | Louisiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 44.8% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 50.3% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via CO2 testing 38.0% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via HC testing |
| Notes: | The extraordinary improvement numbers found in this test report are primarily due to the extreme carbon build up in the Brahma's engine. FPC was able to clean the engine resulting in improvement numbers that are much larger than the norm. Per the observations section of the report, the gas analyzer's filters were plugged during the baseline testing: this implies that the percent improvement for the Brahma may actually be larger than the numbers reported. |
Result 65 of 76
| Test Id: | 139 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Tri-County Transit |
| File Size: | 9.575 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Feb-1991 |
| Test Date: | 8-Aug-1990 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.1% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 70.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 1.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 22.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing |
Result 66 of 76
| Test Id: | 30 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Triangle Gas Company |
| File Size: | 26.224 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-May-1987 |
| Test Date: | 17-Apr-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via CO2 testing |
Result 67 of 76
| Test Id: | 76 |
|---|---|
| Title: | US Steel |
| File Size: | 8.190 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Oct-1988 |
| Test Date: | 30-Aug-1988 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 41.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing |
Result 68 of 76
| Test Id: | 21 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp |
| File Size: | 39.809 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing |
Result 69 of 76
| Test Id: | 9 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light Scenic |
| File Size: | 6.994 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 27-Jul-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing |
Result 70 of 76
| Test Id: | 115 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Vogel Disposal |
| File Size: | 10.107 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 9-Dec-1987 |
| Test Date: | 28-Nov-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 71 of 76
| Test Id: | 117 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wal-Mart |
| File Size: | 34.933 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 6-Mar-1995 |
| Test Date: | 1-Mar-1995 |
| Test Location: | Arkansas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -42.2% average improvement on 3 Detroit S-60 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via CO2 testing -2.4% average improvement on 4 Detroit S-60 engines via HC testing |
Result 72 of 76
| Test Id: | 118 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Waste Management of Dallas |
| File Size: | 36.117 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Jun-1995 |
| Test Date: | 25-Apr-1995 |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.0% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 11.5% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.2% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 0.8% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 73 of 76
| Test Id: | 119 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wayne W. Sell Corporation |
| File Size: | 10.465 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1987 |
| Test Date: | 19-Nov-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 74 of 76
| Test Id: | 15 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wepher Marine |
| File Size: | 6.407 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 16-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via CO2 testing 29.1% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 75 of 76
| Test Id: | 19 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Willamette & Pacific |
| File Size: | 46.817 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-1995 |
| Test Date: | 1-Feb-1995 |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -22.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing 1.5% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 18.6% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 76 of 76
| Test Id: | 3 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wisconsin Central |
| File Size: | 53.768 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 19-Aug-1996 |
| Test Date: | 14-Aug-1996 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.9% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO testing 1.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 5.2% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 8.4% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engine via CO2 testing -18.5% average improvement on 7 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via HC testing 10.2% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via HC testing 17.8% average improvement on 10 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 27.5% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing |