Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There is 1 document that matches your query. This 1 document contains a total of 56 individual tests. The document is listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 1 location
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 4 different engine manufacturers
- 5 different engine types
- 5 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 12 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.273%
- 7 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 18.429%
- 13 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.150%
- 11 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 19.098%
- 13 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.535%
Result 1 of 1
| Test Id: | 26 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Provo City |
| File Size: | 51.613 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 12-Sep-1995 |
| Test Date: | 12-Jun-1995 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing -19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing 22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing 3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing 32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing 5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing 33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing 21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing |