Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There is 1 document that matches your query. This 1 document contains a total of 20 individual tests. The document is listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 1 location
- 1 industry
- 1 type of fuel
- 4 different engine manufacturers
- 4 different engine types
- 4 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 5 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.680%
- 5 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of -2.440%
- 5 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 25.100%
- 5 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.390%
Result 1 of 1
| Test Id: | 161 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Gatlinburg 
|
| File Size: | 4.200 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Aug-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -2.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO2 testing 25.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via HC testing |