Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There is 1 document that matches your query. This 1 document contains a total of 53 individual tests. The document is listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 1 location
- 1 industry
- 1 type of fuel
- 3 different engine manufacturers
- 3 different engine types
- 5 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 11 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.039%
- 10 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 18.073%
- 10 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 17.825%
- 11 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 23.522%
- 11 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.623%
Result 1 of 1
| Test Id: | 211 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Echo Bay Mining |
| File Size: | 22.349 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 29-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Nevada, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing |