Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 165 documents that match your query. These 165 documents contain a total of 2,328 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

• 48 locations
• 7 different industries
• 5 different fuel types
• 52 different engine manufacturers
• 185 different engine types
• 12 different test procedures

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

• 112 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.486%
• 585 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.109%
• 29 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.291%
• 318 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.636%
• 19 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.776%
• 382 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.632%
• 396 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.706%
• 414 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.907%
• 12 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 37.442%
• 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
• 9 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -6.067%
• 33 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 27.952%

Result 1 of 165

Test Id:	8
Title:	A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine
File Size:	33.744 MB
Industries:	Mining, Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jul-1994
Test Date:	17-Apr-1994
Test Location:	West Virginia, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing -1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing 11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing 11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing 29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing 91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing 57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 2 of 165

Test Id:	146
Title:	AgipPetroli
File Size:	3.862 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Rome, Italy
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via CO testing 33.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via HC testing

Result 3 of 165

Test Id:	69
Title:	Alaska Railroad Corporation
File Size:	72.735 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	10-Nov-1995
Test Date:	16-Sep-1995
Test Location:	Alaska, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing -13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 4 of 165

Test Id:	78
Title:	Andhra Pradesh
File Size:	9.721 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	30-Oct-1994
Test Date:	28-Oct-1994
Test Location:	Andhra Pradesh, India
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing 10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing 18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 5 of 165

Test Id:	170
Title:	Armco Steel Testimonial
File Size:	1.054 MB
Industries:	Buses, Railroad, Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:
Report Date:	24-Oct-1994
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 6 of 165

Test Id:	71
Title:	Australia Railroad Group (ARG)
File Size:	4.805 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2006
Test Date:	12-Jun-2006
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 4 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing

Result 7 of 165

Test Id:	148
Title:	AWP Contractors
File Size:	14.240 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Mar-1996
Test Date:	11-Jan-1996
Test Location:	Alberta, Canada
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 777C engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 6.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 785B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 8 of 165

Test Id:	149
Title:	Azienda Perugina Delia Mobilita
File Size:	4.773 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-Sep-1998
Test Date:	1-Aug-1997
Test Location:	Perugia, Italy
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% improvement on a IVECO Bus engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 9 of 165

Test Id:	193
Title:	Azienda Perugina della Mobilita Testimonial
File Size:	0.015 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-Sep-1998
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Perugia, Italy
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.7% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing

Result 10 of 165

Test Id:	79
Title:	BEC-allwaste
File Size:	22.693 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	15-Sep-1996
Test Date:	10-Jul-1996
Test Location:	Alabama, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing 0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing -3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing 17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing -1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing 14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing 11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing 10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing 14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing 42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing 29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing 19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing 29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing 36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 11 of 165

Test Id:	14
Title:	Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station
File Size:	13.352 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-1992
Test Date:	25-Oct-1992
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing -45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing -10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing 7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing 38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 12 of 165

Test Id:	80
Title:	BFI Holding
File Size:	16.594 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	18-Nov-1994
Test Date:	7-Sep-1994
Test Location:	Duiven, Netherlands
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 13 of 165

Test Id:	39
Title:	Big Bell Mine
File Size:	0.051 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Sep-1999
Test Date:	16-Aug-1999
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 14 of 165

Test Id:	40
Title:	Blue Circle Cement
File Size:	0.067 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-1997
Test Date:	1-Mar-1997
Test Location:	Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Smoke Spot testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -7.7% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Withdrawal testing

Result 15 of 165

Test Id:	144
Title:	Boiler Efficiency
File Size:	8.345 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	9-Aug-1983
Test Date:	19-Apr-1983
Test Location:	North Carolina, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 1.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 16 of 165

Test Id:	150
Title:	Boiler Efficiency and Sludge Control
File Size:	17.635 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	19-Apr-1983
Test Location:	North Carolina, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 17 of 165

Test Id:	27
Title:	Boise Cascade Corporation
File Size:	12.213 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	10-Aug-1993
Test Date:	3-Aug-1993
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing

Result 18 of 165

Test Id:	81
Title:	Boise Urban Stages
File Size:	6.812 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	10-Aug-1993
Test Date:	1-Aug-1993
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing 5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing -2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing 52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing 0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 19 of 165

Test Id:	42
Title:	Boral
File Size:	0.119 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-May-1998
Test Date:	11-May-1998
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 20 of 165

Test Id:	82
Title:	Brambles Trucking
File Size:	0.488 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	13-Feb-1992
Test Date:	14-Nov-1991
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing 23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing 20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 21 of 165

Test Id:	83
Title:	Broward County Schools
File Size:	14.875 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	4-Apr-1995
Test Date:	28-Oct-1994
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins B engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 3 Navistar 444 engines via CO testing 19.6% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO testing -9.4% average improvement on 2 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via CO2 testing 1.9% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO2 testing 4.2% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO2 testing -18.2% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via HC testing 7.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via HC testing 15.5% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via HC testing -36.5% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via HC testing 13.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.3% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 22 of 165

Test Id:	130
Title:	Canada ESDC (SFAT Development) Tests
File Size:	2.481 MB
Industries:
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Mar-1998
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Quebec, Canada
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 3.9% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via CO testing 1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 23 of 165

Test Id:	187
Title:	Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway
File Size:	26.822 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-May-2000
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing 43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing 11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 24 of 165

Test Id:	13
Title:	Central Electricty Board Mauritius
File Size:	3.989 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Nov-1997
Test Date:	4-Aug-1997
Test Location:	Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 4 Pielstick 18 PC3 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 25 of 165

Test Id:	41
Title:	Central Norsman
File Size:	0.095 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-May-2004
Test Date:	21-Apr-2004
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 26 of 165

Test Id:	6
Title:	Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad
File Size:	13.241 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	16-Nov-1998
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Oregon, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 27 of 165

Test Id:	84
Title:	Charley Brothers
File Size:	14.550 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jul-1989
Test Date:	13-Apr-1989
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.8% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.6% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -69.5% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via HC testing -85.7% improvement on a Navistar 444 engine via HC testing

Result 28 of 165

Test Id:	85
Title:	Cheran Transport
File Size:	24.740 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	30-Jun-1994
Test Date:	11-Feb-1994
Test Location:	Tamil Nadu, India
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.5% average improvement on 9 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 18.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 6-65 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.9% improvement on a Viking BW engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via CO2 testing 2.5% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing -12.6% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing 20.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via HC testing 10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing 35.0% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 29 of 165

Test Id:	86
Title:	City of Boise
File Size:	5.064 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.4% improvement on a Cummins 270 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Cummins 330 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Mack 300 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.3% improvement on a Cummins 330 engine via HC testing

Result 30 of 165

Test Id:	161
Title:	City of Gatlinburg
File Size:	4.200 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	15-Aug-1990
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -2.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO2 testing 25.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via HC testing

Result 31 of 165

Test Id:	87
Title:	City of Ogden
File Size:	0.561 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-1992
Test Date:	31-Aug-1992
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.4% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.8% improvement on a Cummins L-10 engine via CO testing 31.0% improvement on a Cummins L-10 engine via HC testing

Result 32 of 165

Test Id:	88
Title:	City of Southaven
File Size:	0.774 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date:	28-Dec-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Mississippi, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.7% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -45.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO testing 92.7% average improvement on 2 Isuzu Pickup engines via CO testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO2 testing 7.1% improvement on a Ford Ambulance engine via CO2 testing -1.1% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via CO2 testing -21.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 60.1% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via HC testing 58.9% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via HC testing

Result 33 of 165

Test Id:	89
Title:	Coca-Cola Bottling
File Size:	18.379 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	11-Oct-1994
Test Date:	11-Jul-1994
Test Location:	Texas, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing 0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing 17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 34 of 165

Test Id:	12
Title:	Cominco Alaska Red Dog Mine Powerhouse
File Size:	73.385 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	24-Feb-1995
Test Date:	18-Jan-1995
Test Location:	Alaska, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.1% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 9.0% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO2 testing 13.6% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via HC testing 20.0% improvement on a Wartsila 16V32 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 35 of 165

Test Id:	162
Title:	Commercial Carrier Corporation
File Size:	3.342 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	26-Sep-1990
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing

Result 36 of 165

Test Id:	17
Title:	Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans
File Size:	5.262 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	26-Nov-1987
Test Date:	1-Sep-1987
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing

Result 37 of 165

Test Id:	43
Title:	Darlot Gold Mine
File Size:	0.031 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Sep-2006
Test Date:	26-Jul-2006
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 38 of 165

Test Id:	213
Title:	Darlot Gold Mine Power Generation
File Size:	0.163 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	12-Dec-2006
Test Date:	25-Sep-2006
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Smoke Spot testing 7.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3516 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 39 of 165

Test Id:	90
Title:	David A. Tesone Enterprises
File Size:	8.680 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	13-Jun-1987
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing

Result 40 of 165

Test Id:	175
Title:	David Tesone Trucking
File Size:	0.623 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jun-1989
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 41 of 165

Test Id:	91
Title:	Deep South Trucking
File Size:	4.212 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	22-Jul-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Alabama, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: -5.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 310 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via CO testing 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via HC testing

Result 42 of 165

Test Id:	18
Title:	Devall Diesel
File Size:	5.236 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2000
Test Date:	5-Jun-2000
Test Location:	Louisiana, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing -28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 43 of 165

Test Id:	92
Title:	Distribution Trucking Company
File Size:	9.884 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	12-Jan-1994
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Oregon, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing -5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing 9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing 9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing 13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing 18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing 7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 44 of 165

Test Id:	44
Title:	Dominion Mining
File Size:	12.589 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	27-May-1994
Test Date:	30-Mar-1994
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 45 of 165

Test Id:	123
Title:	Earth Moving
File Size:	6.384 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jun-1990
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 46 of 165

Test Id:	211
Title:	Echo Bay Mining
File Size:	22.349 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	23-Nov-1994
Test Date:	29-Mar-1994
Test Location:	Nevada, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 47 of 165

Test Id:	121
Title:	Effect of FPC-1 on SO2
File Size:	0.023 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	19-Jul-1985
Test Date:	11-May-1984
Test Location:	North Carolina, USA
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 48 of 165

Test Id:	93
Title:	EG&G Idaho
File Size:	7.940 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	12-Aug-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 49 of 165

Test Id:	28
Title:	EPA Exhaust Emissions
File Size:	7.937 MB
Industries:
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	Gasoline
Report Date:	12-Aug-1981
Test Date:	17-Jun-1981
Test Location:	Colorado, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.2% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.1% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via CO testing 27.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via CO testing 21.4% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via HC testing -4.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via HC testing -3.3% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via NOx testing 7.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via NOx testing

Result 50 of 165

Test Id:	131
Title:	ESDC (RP-503, SFAT, AAR 3-Mode) Report for Go Transit
File Size:	0.149 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-Feb-2003
Test Date:	11-Feb-2003
Test Location:	Quebec, Canada
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 3 EMD 710G3A engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via CO testing 5.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 51 of 165

Test Id:	63
Title:	Esperance Port Authority
File Size:	0.138 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2001
Test Date:	5-Jul-2001
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 36.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 52 of 165

Test Id:	152
Title:	Farm Development Corporation
File Size:	1.237 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	24-Aug-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Engine Emissions Results: 95.0% improvement on a Kewanee Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 53 of 165

Test Id:	57
Title:	Fimiston Open Pit
File Size:	0.117 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Sep-1997
Test Date:	28-Jun-1997
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -4.0% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Withdrawal testing

Result 54 of 165

Test Id:	188
Title:	FMC Testimonial
File Size:	0.069 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	29-Sep-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 10.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on an engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on an engine via HC testing 16.0% improvement on an engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 55 of 165

Test Id:	94
Title:	FMC, Dry Valley Mine
File Size:	3.820 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	2-Aug-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 56 of 165

Test Id:	95
Title:	FMC, Skull Point Field Trial
File Size:	28.206 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	26-Jun-1994
Test Date:	21-Jul-1994
Test Location:	Wyoming, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing

Result 57 of 165

Test Id:	20
Title:	Freight Australia
File Size:	5.570 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Sep-2000
Test Date:	23-Jul-2000
Test Location:	Southern Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 34.9% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 58 of 165

Test Id:	7
Title:	Freight Corp.
File Size:	6.225 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emission credit, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2000
Test Date:	25-May-2000
Test Location:	Southern Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 42.6% average improvement on 2 EMD 710G3A engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 59 of 165

Test Id:	173
Title:	Fuel Technology
File Size:	10.129 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Biocide, Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-May-1989
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 60 of 165

Test Id:	153
Title:	Furnace Evaluation
File Size:	4.734 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	29-Dec-1981
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 61 of 165

Test Id:	120
Title:	Gainsville
File Size:	0.028 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	20-Aug-1990
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 6.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 41.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing

Result 62 of 165

Test Id:	72
Title:	Geneva Steel
File Size:	7.723 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	22-Feb-1999
Test Date:	12-Apr-1997
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing -8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing 11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 63 of 165

Test Id:	96
Title:	Golden Gem Growers
File Size:	9.576 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Feb-1991
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via CO2 testing 42.5% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via HC testing

Result 64 of 165

Test Id:	34
Title:	Goonyella
File Size:	0.131 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jan-2001
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 784B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 6.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 793B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 65 of 165

Test Id:	55
Title:	Granny Smith Mine
File Size:	0.091 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jun-1999
Test Date:	12-Apr-1999
Test Location:	New South Wales, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 66 of 165

Test Id:	154
Title:	Greyhound Lines , INC
File Size:	34.897 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	1-Jan-1983
Test Location:	Arizona, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.1% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO testing 100.0% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO testing 9.1% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO2 testing 92.2% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via HC testing 88.8% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via HC testing

Result 67 of 165

Test Id:	97
Title:	Greyhound Lines, California
File Size:	6.439 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jun-1989
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	California, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 13 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing

Result 68 of 165

Test Id:	137
Title:	Greyhound Lines, Florida
File Size:	6.244 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	20-Jan-1986
Test Date:	1-Jan-1983
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 92.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO testing 9.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO2 testing 94.0% improvement on a Detroit V871 engine via HC testing

Result 69 of 165

Test Id:	98
Title:	Gujarat
File Size:	21.654 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	30-Jun-1994
Test Date:	11-Feb-1992
Test Location:	Gujarat, India
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.9% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.3% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via CO2 testing -0.8% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing -4.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing 17.3% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via HC testing 10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing 33.0% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Smoke Spot testing 43.0% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 70 of 165

Test Id:	163
Title:	Hattiesburg Public Schools
File Size:	6.024 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	24-Mar-1993
Test Date:	25-Sep-1992
Test Location:	Mississippi, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet 366 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 0.8% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing

Result 71 of 165

Test Id:	99
Title:	Hillsborough County School
File Size:	46.021 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	11-Aug-1994
Test Date:	5-Apr-1994
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.9% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO testing 20.9% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO testing 16.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO2 testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO2 testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via HC testing -22.4% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via HC testing 11.6% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Smoke Spot testing 41.0% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a International DT466 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 72 of 165

Test Id:	178
Title:	Indiana Harbor Belt RR
File Size:	3.366 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	25-Feb-1998
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Indiana, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 7.7% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 7.7% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.0% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 21.0% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Smoke Spot testing 21.0% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 73 of 165

Test Id:	164
Title:	Industrial Waste Services
File Size:	3.543 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	20-Jul-1990
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 19.0% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 19.0% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 7.6% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO2 testing 29.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 29.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via HC testing

Result 74 of 165

Test Id:	24
Title:	Interlink Express
File Size:	9.470 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	14-Dec-1995
Test Date:	19-Jul-1995
Test Location:	England, England
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 75 of 165

Test Id:	100
Title:	J.R.C. Enterprises
File Size:	7.130 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Sep-1983
Test Date:	1-Jul-1983
Test Location:	Arizona, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7011 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO testing 9.3% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO2 testing 41.2% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via HC testing

Result 76 of 165

Test Id:	101
Title:	JBP Companies
File Size:	0.424 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	22-Apr-1992
Test Date:	20-Jan-1992
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing

Result 77 of 165

Test Id:	142
Title:	Jelco Buses
File Size:	10.387 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-Mar-1988
Test Date:	21-Jan-1988
Test Location:	Wisconsin, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing -19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing

Result 78 of 165

Test Id:	155
Title:	K.D. Perdana
File Size:	15.724 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	1-Feb-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Engine Emissions Results: 28.7% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 66.1% average improvement on 2 Mercedes Genset engines via Wear Metals testing 26.6% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Wear Metals testing

Result 79 of 165

Test Id:	48
Title:	KCGM Super Pit
File Size:	0.187 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2003
Test Date:	19-Jul-2003
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 80 of 165

Test Id:	49
Title:	Kennecott Copper
File Size:	26.441 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	12-Apr-1995
Test Date:	27-Feb-1995
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 81 of 165

Test Id:	103
Title:	Knoxville Transportation
File Size:	7.635 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	20-Jun-1985
Test Date:	12-Nov-1984
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 10.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.9% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing

Result 82 of 165

Test Id:	74
Title:	Kyle Railroad
File Size:	22.532 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	6-Dec-1995
Test Date:	1-Jun-1995
Test Location:	Kansas, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 9 GE U30C-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.1% average improvement on 17 GE U30C-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 83 of 165

Test Id:	179
Title:	Kyle Railroad Testimonial
File Size:	1.517 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	4-Jun-1997
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Kansas, USA
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 84 of 165

Test Id:	104
Title:	Laidlaw Bus
File Size:	13.087 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	23-May-1996
Test Date:	27-Mar-1996
Test Location:	Wisconsin, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing 23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing 6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing 30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing -0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing 18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing 45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 85 of 165

Test Id:	105
Title:	Lusk
File Size:	21.380 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jul-1994
Test Date:	20-Apr-1994
Test Location:	West Virginia, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing 20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing 56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 86 of 165

Test Id:	68
Title:	M.S.Conus
File Size:	3.148 MB
Industries:	Boiler, Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	1-Aug-1985
Test Date:	1-Sep-1984
Test Location:	Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing

Result 87 of 165

Test Id:	50
Title:	MacMahon
File Size:	0.069 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-May-1997
Test Date:	18-Mar-1997
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 630E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Komatsu 785-3 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.0% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 630E engines via Smoke Spot testing 27.7% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 88 of 165

Test Id:	51
Title:	Magma Copper
File Size:	21.964 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	18-May-1994
Test Date:	14-Apr-1994
Test Location:	Arizona, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing 12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing 21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 89 of 165

Test Id:	106
Title:	Manitowac Transit
File Size:	6.773 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:	1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	30-May-1996
Test Date:	21-May-1996
Test Location:	Wisconsin, USA
Summary:	Engine Emissions Results: 26.9% average improvement on 3 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 36.1% average improvement on 3 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 90 of 165

Test Id:	46
Title:	Marandoo Mine
File Size:	0.223 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2003
Test Date:	13-May-2003
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.6% average improvement on 2 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 25.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 91 of 165

Test Id:	107
Title:	Memphis Cablevision
File Size:	0.655 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	27-Dec-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 11.8% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 17.4% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via CO2 testing 12.4% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via HC testing 29.6% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via HC testing

Result 92 of 165

Test Id:	29
Title:	Mid Florida Mining
File Size:	2.846 MB
Industries:	Boiler, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	22-Jul-1991
Test Date:	12-Apr-1991
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 38.1% improvement on a Boiler engine via CO testing

Result 93 of 165

Test Id:	205
Title:	Montana Rail Link and Washington Central Railroad Company
File Size:	26.818 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	10-Dec-1996
Test Date:	1-Oct-1996
Test Location:	Washington, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 4 EMD SD9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.9% average improvement on 4 EMD SD9 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 94 of 165

Test Id:	128
Title:	Motor Magazine
File Size:	0.295 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:
Report Date:	1-May-2008
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 95 of 165

Test Id:	67
Title:	MT Nivosa
File Size:	0.054 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	11-Nov-1986
Test Date:	1-Apr-1986
Test Location:	Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.1% improvement on a Sulzer 6 RTA 76 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 96 of 165

Test Id:	35
Title:	Mt. Keith Mine
File Size:	0.235 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Sep-2005
Test Date:	26-Jul-2005
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 793C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 97 of 165

Test Id:	36
Title:	Mt. Whaleback Mine
File Size:	0.147 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Feb-2002
Test Date:	18-Dec-2001
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 789 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 98 of 165

Test Id:	108
Title:	Neff Trucking
File Size:	12.954 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	7-Jun-1987
Test Date:	1-Jul-1987
Test Location:	Ohio, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 10.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing

Result 99 of 165

Test Id:	180
Title:	Neff Trucking Testimonial
File Size:	0.699 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	30-Jun-1989
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Ohio, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% improvement on a Mack 300 engine via Statistical testing

Result 100 of 165

Test Id:	66
Title:	Neptune Marine
File Size:	1.232 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	1-May-1988
Test Date:	6-Apr-1985
Test Location:	Singapore, China
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% improvement on a Pielstick 8PC4-2L-570 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 101 of 165

Test Id:	124
Title:	NewsCaster
File Size:	2.593 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	17-Dec-1997
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 102 of 165

Test Id:	22
Title:	Norfolk Southern
File Size:	9.840 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 103 of 165

Test Id:	64
Title:	North Flinders
File Size:	0.165 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-1989
Test Date:	6-May-1989
Test Location:	Southern Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 104 of 165

Test Id:	37
Title:	Norwich Park Mine
File Size:	0.187 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Feb-1990
Test Date:	1-Oct-1989
Test Location:	Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 12.6% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 777D engines via Oil Consumption testing 44.0% average improvement on 12 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Oil Consumption testing 33.0% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Wear Metals testing

Result 105 of 165

Test Id:	53
Title:	Occidental Chemical
File Size:	0.038 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing

Result 106 of 165

Test Id:	156
Title:	Oil-Diesel Mixture
File Size:	3.613 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	22-Jul-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 22.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 107 of 165

Test Id:	54
Title:	Osborne Mines
File Size:	27.664 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jul-2000
Test Date:	7-Jun-2000
Test Location:	Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 12V32E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 108 of 165

Test Id:	75
Title:	Pacific National RR
File Size:	0.257 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Oct-2009
Test Date:	12-Oct-2009
Test Location:	New South Wales, Australia
Summary:	Engine Emissions Results: 46.5% average improvement on 4 EMD GT46CWM engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 109 of 165

Test Id:	56
Title:	Paddington
File Size:	0.099 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-May-2005
Test Date:	21-Mar-2005
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.3% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 110 of 165

Test Id:	157
Title:	Peak Downs mine
File Size:	7.699 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Mar-1991
Test Date:	28-Aug-1990
Test Location:	Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing 43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing 33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 111 of 165

Test Id:	158
Title:	Perilya Mines Fortnum Gold Mine
File Size:	12.006 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-1996
Test Date:	21-Nov-1996
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 112 of 165

Test Id:	192
Title:	Peru Rail
File Size:	0.272 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.
Notes:	Source: Latin Tracks - The Latin American Railway Digest (www.latintracks.net)

Result 113 of 165

Test Id:	133
Title:	Perugia Italy
File Size:	0.029 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Perugia, Italy
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.3% average improvement on 3 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.8% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO testing 0.2% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO2 testing

Result 114 of 165

Test Id:	194
Title:	Perugia Testimonial
File Size:	0.010 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-Sep-1998
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Perugia, Italy
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing

Result 115 of 165

Test Id:	110
Title:	Pierce Trucking
File Size:	5.133 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	9-Nov-1987
Test Date:	1-Oct-1987
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via CO2 testing

Result 116 of 165

Test Id:	26
Title:	Provo City
File Size:	51.613 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date:	12-Sep-1995
Test Date:	12-Jun-1995
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing -19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing 22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing 3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing 32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing 5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing 33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing 21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 117 of 165

Test Id:	182
Title:	Provo Testimonial
File Size:	0.802 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date:	13-Nov-1997
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 118 of 165

Test Id:	125
Title:	Railway Age
File Size:	2.208 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jun-1997
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 119 of 165

Test Id:	65
Title:	RedBank Power
File Size:	0.228 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:
Report Date:	1-Nov-1983
Test Date:	12-Oct-1983
Test Location:	New South Wales, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing 4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing

Result 120 of 165

Test Id:	136
Title:	Rio Tinto UWA Thesis
File Size:	3.684 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	24-Nov-2005
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing

Result 121 of 165

Test Id:	222
Title:	Royal Caribbean
File Size:	4.725 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	14-May-2012
Test Date:	8-Apr-2012
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 122 of 165

Test Id:	196
Title:	Sadler
File Size:	0.177 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing

Result 123 of 165

Test Id:	58
Title:	San Juan Coal
File Size:	3.470 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jan-1985
Test Date:	1-Aug-1984
Test Location:	New Mexico, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing

Result 124 of 165

Test Id:	47
Title:	Smoky Canyon Mine
File Size:	7.162 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	2-Sep-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Wyoming, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 125 of 165

Test Id:	159
Title:	SO2 in Oil Fired Boilers
File Size:	3.970 MB
Industries:	Boiler
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:	4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date:	19-Jul-1985
Test Date:	11-May-1985
Test Location:	North Carolina, USA
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 126 of 165

Test Id:	204
Title:	Southwest Research EPA Emissions
File Size:	2.017 MB
Industries:
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:	Gasoline
Report Date:	1-Jun-1997
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Texas, USA
Summary:	Engine Emissions Results: 18.8% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via HC testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via NOx testing

Result 127 of 165

Test Id:	172
Title:	Southwest Research Locomotive Emissions NOx
File Size:	1.935 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Oct-1994
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Texas, USA
Summary:	Engine Emissions Results: 24.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SD40-2 engines via NOx testing 24.0% improvement on a GE C40-8 engine via NOx testing

Result 128 of 165

Test Id:	171
Title:	Southwest Research RP-503
File Size:	0.353 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Jul-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Texas, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 1.7% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.5% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via CO testing 4.6% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via HC testing -3.8% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via NOx testing
Notes:	This test was conducted on a clean, new EMD 12-645E3B.

Result 129 of 165

Test Id:	111
Title:	Stein Distributing
File Size:	0.031 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	14-Sep-1992
Test Date:	1-Aug-1992
Test Location:	Washington, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.1% average improvement on 3 Ford 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing

Result 130 of 165

Test Id:	183
Title:	Stein Distributing Company
File Size:	0.603 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	24-Nov-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Idaho, USA
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 131 of 165

Test Id:	135
Title:	System Controls
File Size:	4.432 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Laboratory Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	Gasoline
Report Date:	28-May-1982
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	California, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet V8 engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.1% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via CO testing 1.3% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via HC testing -2.0% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via NOx testing

Result 132 of 165

Test Id:	112
Title:	T.G. Lee Foods, Inc
File Size:	13.442 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	30-Oct-1995
Test Date:	25-Oct-1995
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing 16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing 8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 133 of 165

Test Id:	52
Title:	Telfer Mine
File Size:	0.063 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-1998
Test Date:	16-Nov-1998
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 785B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 134 of 165

Test Id:	126
Title:	The Daily Herald
File Size:	5.762 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Nov-1995
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 135 of 165

Test Id:	166
Title:	The Metropolitan Transit Authority
File Size:	5.507 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	23-Dec-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Alabama, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 13.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 45.2% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing

Result 136 of 165

Test Id:	127
Title:	The Plus Factor
File Size:	2.690 MB
Industries:	Boiler, Generators, Mining, Railroad, Trucking
Report Type:	Publication
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2008
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 137 of 165

Test Id:	167
Title:	The Tennessee Department of Transportation
File Size:	5.206 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	22-Dec-1992
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 13.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 19.7% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 20.6% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.3% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 30.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 32.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing

Result 138 of 165

Test Id:	60
Title:	Thiess Contractors
File Size:	0.177 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-2001
Test Date:	15-Nov-2001
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 785C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 139 of 165

Test Id:	2
Title:	Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco)
File Size:	7.716 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Sep-1988
Test Date:	7-Jul-1988
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing 8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing 31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing

Result 140 of 165

Test Id:	113
Title:	Three Rivers Ice Cream
File Size:	6.057 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	20-Aug-1988
Test Date:	25-May-1988
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.8% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO testing 13.2% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 22.6% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via HC testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via HC testing

Result 141 of 165

Test Id:	199
Title:	Three Rivers Testimonial
File Size:	0.035 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jun-1989
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing

Result 142 of 165

Test Id:	16
Title:	Tidewater Marine
File Size:	19.169 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	17-Aug-1982
Test Date:	23-Jul-1982
Test Location:	Louisiana, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 44.8% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 50.3% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via CO2 testing 38.0% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via HC testing
Notes:	The extraordinary improvement numbers found in this test report are primarily due to the extreme carbon build up in the Brahma's engine. FPC was able to clean the engine resulting in improvement numbers that are much larger than the norm. Per the observations section of the report, the gas analyzer's filters were plugged during the baseline testing: this implies that the percent improvement for the Brahma may actually be larger than the numbers reported.

Result 143 of 165

Test Id:	184
Title:	Traco Testimonial
File Size:	0.648 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Jun-1989
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing

Result 144 of 165

Test Id:	139
Title:	Tri-County Transit
File Size:	9.575 MB
Industries:	Buses
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	20-Feb-1991
Test Date:	8-Aug-1990
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 2.1% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 70.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 1.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 22.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing

Result 145 of 165

Test Id:	30
Title:	Triangle Gas Company
File Size:	26.224 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-May-1987
Test Date:	17-Apr-1987
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via CO2 testing

Result 146 of 165

Test Id:	185
Title:	Triangle Gas Company Testimonial
File Size:	0.589 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	11-Aug-1987
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing

Result 147 of 165

Test Id:	114
Title:	United Telephone
File Size:	12.168 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	2-Oct-1988
Test Date:	10-Aug-1988
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 1.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 1.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing

Result 148 of 165

Test Id:	5
Title:	UP&L
File Size:	6.749 MB
Industries:	Generators
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	9-May-1990
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 9 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 28.8% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 25.2% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -2.6% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via HC testing

Result 149 of 165

Test Id:	76
Title:	US Steel
File Size:	8.190 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	10-Oct-1988
Test Date:	30-Aug-1988
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 41.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing

Result 150 of 165

Test Id:	21
Title:	Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp
File Size:	39.809 MB
Industries:	Mining, Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	29-Apr-1992
Test Date:	21-Jun-1991
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing

Result 151 of 165

Test Id:	9
Title:	Utah Power and Light Scenic
File Size:	6.994 MB
Industries:	Generators, Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date:	27-Jul-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Utah, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing

Result 152 of 165

Test Id:	168
Title:	V.E. Whitehurst & Sons
File Size:	1.646 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	6-Jun-1991
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.2% improvement on a Int'l 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 250 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.5% improvement on a Int'l 7.3 engine via HC testing 15.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 250 engines via HC testing 15.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing

Result 153 of 165

Test Id:	115
Title:	Vogel Disposal
File Size:	10.107 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	9-Dec-1987
Test Date:	28-Nov-1987
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing

Result 154 of 165

Test Id:	61
Title:	Vulcan Minerals
File Size:	0.070 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:
Report Date:	20-Jan-1998
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Not Given in Report
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 155 of 165

Test Id:	117
Title:	Wal-Mart
File Size:	34.933 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	6-Mar-1995
Test Date:	1-Mar-1995
Test Location:	Arkansas, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -42.2% average improvement on 3 Detroit S-60 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via CO2 testing -2.4% average improvement on 4 Detroit S-60 engines via HC testing

Result 156 of 165

Test Id:	116
Title:	Walbon Transit
File Size:	0.033 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	2-Oct-1995
Test Date:	1-Sep-1995
Test Location:	Florida, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 235 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 157 of 165

Test Id:	118
Title:	Waste Management of Dallas
File Size:	36.117 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	28-Jun-1995
Test Date:	25-Apr-1995
Test Location:	Texas, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 8.0% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 11.5% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.2% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 0.8% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 158 of 165

Test Id:	119
Title:	Wayne W. Sell Corporation
File Size:	10.465 MB
Industries:	Trucking
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Dec-1987
Test Date:	19-Nov-1987
Test Location:	Pennsylvania, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO2 testing

Result 159 of 165

Test Id:	15
Title:	Wepher Marine
File Size:	6.407 MB
Industries:	Marine
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	16-Sep-1993
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Tennessee, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via CO2 testing 29.1% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 160 of 165

Test Id:	38
Title:	Wesfarmers Coal
File Size:	0.176 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Aug-2001
Test Date:	3-Jul-2001
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Komatsu 149 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.3% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 149 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 161 of 165

Test Id:	19
Title:	Willamette & Pacific
File Size:	46.817 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Mar-1995
Test Date:	1-Feb-1995
Test Location:	Oregon, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -22.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing 1.5% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 18.6% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 162 of 165

Test Id:	186
Title:	Willamette & Pacific Testimonial
File Size:	0.593 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Testimonial
Benefits:	Emissions
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	21-Aug-1996
Test Date:	Not Given in Report
Test Location:	Oregon, USA
Summary:	No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above.

Result 163 of 165

Test Id:	3
Title:	Wisconsin Central
File Size:	53.768 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	19-Aug-1996
Test Date:	14-Aug-1996
Test Location:	Wisconsin, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.9% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO testing 1.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 5.2% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 8.4% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engine via CO2 testing -18.5% average improvement on 7 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via HC testing 10.2% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via HC testing 17.8% average improvement on 10 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 27.5% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 164 of 165

Test Id:	4
Title:	Wisconsin Central 2
File Size:	6.093 MB
Industries:	Railroad
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Oct-1996
Test Date:	29-May-1996
Test Location:	Wisconsin, USA
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 4 EMD 645E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.6% improvement on a EMD SD45 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 165 of 165

Test Id:	62
Title:	Worsley Alumina
File Size:	0.101 MB
Industries:	Mining
Report Type:	Field Test
Benefits:	Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels:	2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date:	1-Mar-2004
Test Date:	23-Jul-2003
Test Location:	Western Australia, Australia
Summary:	Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 985 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.2% average improvement on 5 Komatsu 985 engines via Smoke Spot testing