Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 83 documents that match your query. These 83 documents contain a total of 1,792 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 32 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 36 different engine manufacturers
- 111 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 57 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.487%
- 387 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.636%
- 17 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.221%
- 215 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.616%
- 16 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.484%
- 392 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.728%
- 361 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.360%
- 346 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.703%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 41 of 83
| Test Id: | 8 |
|---|---|
| Title: | A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine |
| File Size: | 33.744 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Date: | 17-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing -1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing 11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing 11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing 29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing 91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing 57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 42 of 83
| Test Id: | 146 |
|---|---|
| Title: | AgipPetroli |
| File Size: | 3.862 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Rome, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via CO testing 33.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via HC testing |
Result 43 of 83
| Test Id: | 69 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Alaska Railroad Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 72.735 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Nov-1995 |
| Test Date: | 16-Sep-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing -13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 44 of 83
| Test Id: | 78 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Andhra Pradesh |
| File Size: | 9.721 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 28-Oct-1994 |
| Test Location: | Andhra Pradesh, India |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing 10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing 18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 45 of 83
| Test Id: | 70 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel |
| File Size: | 16.072 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Jul-1985 |
| Test Date: | 20-Feb-1985 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 46 of 83
| Test Id: | 79 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BEC-allwaste |
| File Size: | 22.693 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Sep-1996 |
| Test Date: | 10-Jul-1996 |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing 0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing -3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing 17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing -1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing 14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing 11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing 10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing 14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing 42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing 29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing 19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing 29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing 36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 47 of 83
| Test Id: | 14 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station |
| File Size: | 13.352 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1992 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing -45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing -10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing 7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing 38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 48 of 83
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 49 of 83
| Test Id: | 27 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Cascade Corporation |
| File Size: | 12.213 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 3-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing |
Result 50 of 83
| Test Id: | 81 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Urban Stages |
| File Size: | 6.812 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing 5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing -2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing 52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing 0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 51 of 83
| Test Id: | 82 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Brambles Trucking |
| File Size: | 0.488 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Feb-1992 |
| Test Date: | 14-Nov-1991 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing 23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing 20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 52 of 83
| Test Id: | 83 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Broward County Schools |
| File Size: | 14.875 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 4-Apr-1995 |
| Test Date: | 28-Oct-1994 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins B engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 3 Navistar 444 engines via CO testing 19.6% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO testing -9.4% average improvement on 2 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via CO2 testing 1.9% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO2 testing 4.2% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO2 testing -18.2% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via HC testing 7.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via HC testing 15.5% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via HC testing -36.5% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via HC testing 13.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.3% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 53 of 83
| Test Id: | 130 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Canada ESDC (SFAT Development) Tests |
| File Size: | 2.481 MB |
| Industries: | |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-1998 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Quebec, Canada |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 3.9% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via CO testing 1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 54 of 83
| Test Id: | 187 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway |
| File Size: | 26.822 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-2000 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing 43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing 11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 55 of 83
| Test Id: | 41 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Norsman |
| File Size: | 0.095 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-2004 |
| Test Date: | 21-Apr-2004 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 56 of 83
| Test Id: | 84 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Charley Brothers |
| File Size: | 14.550 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1989 |
| Test Date: | 13-Apr-1989 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.8% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.6% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -69.5% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via HC testing -85.7% improvement on a Navistar 444 engine via HC testing |
Result 57 of 83
| Test Id: | 161 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Gatlinburg
|
| File Size: | 4.200 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Aug-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -2.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO testing -2.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO2 testing 6.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO2 testing 25.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via HC testing 25.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via HC testing |
Result 58 of 83
| Test Id: | 87 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Ogden |
| File Size: | 0.561 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | 31-Aug-1992 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.4% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.8% improvement on a Cummins L-10 engine via CO testing 31.0% improvement on a Cummins L-10 engine via HC testing |
Result 59 of 83
| Test Id: | 88 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Southaven |
| File Size: | 0.774 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 28-Dec-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Mississippi, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.7% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -45.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO testing 92.7% average improvement on 2 Isuzu Pickup engines via CO testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO2 testing 7.1% improvement on a Ford Ambulance engine via CO2 testing -1.1% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via CO2 testing -21.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 60.1% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via HC testing 58.9% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via HC testing |
Result 60 of 83
| Test Id: | 89 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Coca-Cola Bottling |
| File Size: | 18.379 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 11-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 11-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing 0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing 17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 61 of 83
| Test Id: | 12 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Cominco Alaska Red Dog Mine Powerhouse |
| File Size: | 73.385 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Feb-1995 |
| Test Date: | 18-Jan-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.1% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 9.0% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO2 testing 13.6% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via HC testing 20.0% improvement on a Wartsila 16V32 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 62 of 83
| Test Id: | 162 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation
|
| File Size: | 3.342 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing |
Result 63 of 83
| Test Id: | 17 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans |
| File Size: | 5.262 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 64 of 83
| Test Id: | 90 |
|---|---|
| Title: | David A. Tesone Enterprises
|
| File Size: | 8.680 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Jun-1987 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 65 of 83
| Test Id: | 91 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Deep South Trucking |
| File Size: | 4.212 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Jul-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: -5.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 310 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via CO testing 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 66 of 83
| Test Id: | 18 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Devall Diesel |
| File Size: | 5.236 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 |
| Test Date: | 5-Jun-2000 |
| Test Location: | Louisiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing -28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 67 of 83
| Test Id: | 92 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Distribution Trucking Company |
| File Size: | 9.884 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Jan-1994 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing -5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing 9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing 9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing 13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing 18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing 7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 68 of 83
| Test Id: | 44 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Dominion Mining |
| File Size: | 12.589 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 27-May-1994 |
| Test Date: | 30-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 69 of 83
| Test Id: | 211 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Echo Bay Mining |
| File Size: | 22.349 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 29-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Nevada, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 70 of 83
| Test Id: | 93 |
|---|---|
| Title: | EG&G Idaho |
| File Size: | 7.940 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 71 of 83
| Test Id: | 28 |
|---|---|
| Title: | EPA Exhaust Emissions |
| File Size: | 7.937 MB |
| Industries: | |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 12-Aug-1981 |
| Test Date: | 17-Jun-1981 |
| Test Location: | Colorado, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.2% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.1% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via CO testing 27.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via CO testing 21.4% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via HC testing -4.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via HC testing -3.3% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via NOx testing 7.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via NOx testing |
Result 72 of 83
| Test Id: | 131 |
|---|---|
| Title: | ESDC (RP-503, SFAT, AAR 3-Mode) Report for Go Transit |
| File Size: | 0.149 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Feb-2003 |
| Test Date: | 11-Feb-2003 |
| Test Location: | Quebec, Canada |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 3 EMD 710G3A engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via CO testing 5.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 73 of 83
| Test Id: | 188 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC Testimonial |
| File Size: | 0.069 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 29-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on an engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on an engine via HC testing 16.0% improvement on an engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 74 of 83
| Test Id: | 94 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC, Dry Valley Mine |
| File Size: | 3.820 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 75 of 83
| Test Id: | 95 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC, Skull Point Field Trial |
| File Size: | 28.206 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Jun-1994 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing |
Result 76 of 83
| Test Id: | 120 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Gainsville |
| File Size: | 0.028 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Aug-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 6.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 41.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing |
Result 77 of 83
| Test Id: | 72 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Geneva Steel |
| File Size: | 7.723 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Feb-1999 |
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1997 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing -8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing 11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 78 of 83
| Test Id: | 154 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Greyhound Lines , INC |
| File Size: | 34.897 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | 1-Jan-1983 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.1% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO testing 100.0% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO testing 9.1% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO2 testing 92.2% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via HC testing 88.8% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via HC testing |
Result 79 of 83
| Test Id: | 137 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Greyhound Lines, Florida |
| File Size: | 6.244 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Jan-1986 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jan-1983 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 92.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO testing 9.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO2 testing 94.0% improvement on a Detroit V871 engine via HC testing |
Result 80 of 83
| Test Id: | 99 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Hillsborough County School |
| File Size: | 46.021 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 11-Aug-1994 |
| Test Date: | 5-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.9% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO testing 20.9% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO testing 16.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO2 testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO2 testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via HC testing -22.4% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via HC testing 11.6% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Smoke Spot testing 41.0% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a International DT466 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 81 of 83
| Test Id: | 73 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad |
| File Size: | 15.412 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Sep-1997 |
| Test Date: | 4-Aug-1997 |
| Test Location: | Indiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.6% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO testing 59.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO testing -18.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO testing 9.7% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO2 testing 6.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 34.5% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via HC testing 53.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via HC testing 50.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing |
Result 82 of 83
| Test Id: | 164 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Industrial Waste Services
|
| File Size: | 3.543 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Jul-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 19.0% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 19.0% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 7.6% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO2 testing 29.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 29.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via HC testing |
Result 83 of 83
| Test Id: | 24 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Interlink Express |
| File Size: | 9.470 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 14-Dec-1995 |
| Test Date: | 19-Jul-1995 |
| Test Location: | England, England |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 84 of 83
| Test Id: | 100 |
|---|---|
| Title: | J.R.C. Enterprises |
| File Size: | 7.130 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1983 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jul-1983 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7011 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO testing 9.3% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO2 testing 41.2% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via HC testing |
Result 85 of 83
| Test Id: | 101 |
|---|---|
| Title: | JBP Companies |
| File Size: | 0.424 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Apr-1992 |
| Test Date: | 20-Jan-1992 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 86 of 83
| Test Id: | 142 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Jelco Buses |
| File Size: | 10.387 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Mar-1988 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jan-1988 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing -19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing |
Result 87 of 83
| Test Id: | 49 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Kennecott Copper |
| File Size: | 26.441 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Apr-1995 |
| Test Date: | 27-Feb-1995 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 88 of 83
| Test Id: | 104 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Laidlaw Bus |
| File Size: | 13.087 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-May-1996 |
| Test Date: | 27-Mar-1996 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing 23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing 6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing 30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing -0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing 18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing 45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 89 of 83
| Test Id: | 105 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Lusk |
| File Size: | 21.380 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Date: | 20-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing 20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing 56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 90 of 83
| Test Id: | 68 |
|---|---|
| Title: | M.S.Conus |
| File Size: | 3.148 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing |
Result 91 of 83
| Test Id: | 51 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Magma Copper |
| File Size: | 21.964 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-May-1994 |
| Test Date: | 14-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing 12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing 21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 92 of 83
| Test Id: | 106 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Manitowac Transit |
| File Size: | 6.773 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions |
| Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-May-1996 |
| Test Date: | 21-May-1996 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 26.9% average improvement on 3 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 36.1% average improvement on 3 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 93 of 83
| Test Id: | 29 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Mid Florida Mining |
| File Size: | 2.846 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 22-Jul-1991 |
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1991 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 38.1% improvement on a Boiler engine via CO testing |
Result 94 of 83
| Test Id: | 64 |
|---|---|
| Title: | North Flinders
|
| File Size: | 0.165 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1989 |
| Test Date: | 6-May-1989 |
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 95 of 83
| Test Id: | 53 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Occidental Chemical |
| File Size: | 0.038 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing |
Result 96 of 83
| Test Id: | 157 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Peak Downs mine |
| File Size: | 7.699 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-1991 |
| Test Date: | 28-Aug-1990 |
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing 43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing 33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 97 of 83
| Test Id: | 133 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Perugia Italy |
| File Size: | 0.029 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.3% average improvement on 3 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.8% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO testing 0.2% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO2 testing |
Result 98 of 83
| Test Id: | 26 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Provo City |
| File Size: | 51.613 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 12-Sep-1995 |
| Test Date: | 12-Jun-1995 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing -19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing 22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing 3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing 32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing 5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing 33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing 21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 99 of 83
| Test Id: | 65 |
|---|---|
| Title: | RedBank Power
|
| File Size: | 0.228 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1983 |
| Test Date: | 12-Oct-1983 |
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing 4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing |
Result 100 of 83
| Test Id: | 136 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
| File Size: | 3.684 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 101 of 83
| Test Id: | 222 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Royal Caribbean |
| File Size: | 4.725 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 14-May-2012 |
| Test Date: | 8-Apr-2012 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 102 of 83
| Test Id: | 58 |
|---|---|
| Title: | San Juan Coal |
| File Size: | 3.470 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
| Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 103 of 83
| Test Id: | 47 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
| File Size: | 7.162 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 104 of 83
| Test Id: | 204 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Southwest Research EPA Emissions
|
| File Size: | 2.017 MB |
| Industries: | |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions |
| Fuels: | Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1997 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 18.8% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via HC testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via NOx testing |
Result 105 of 83
| Test Id: | 171 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Southwest Research RP-503
|
| File Size: | 0.353 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jul-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.7% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.5% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via CO testing 4.6% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via HC testing -3.8% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via NOx testing |
| Notes: | This test was conducted on a clean, new EMD 12-645E3B. |
Result 106 of 83
| Test Id: | 135 |
|---|---|
| Title: | System Controls |
| File Size: | 4.432 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 28-May-1982 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | California, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet V8 engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.1% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via CO testing 1.3% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via HC testing -2.0% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via NOx testing |
Result 107 of 83
| Test Id: | 112 |
|---|---|
| Title: | T.G. Lee Foods, Inc |
| File Size: | 13.442 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Oct-1995 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1995 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing 16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing 8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 108 of 83
| Test Id: | 166 |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Metropolitan Transit Authority
|
| File Size: | 5.507 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 45.2% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 109 of 83
| Test Id: | 167 |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Tennessee Department of Transportation
|
| File Size: | 5.206 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 19.7% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 20.6% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.3% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 30.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 32.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing |
Result 110 of 83
| Test Id: | 2 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco)
|
| File Size: | 7.716 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Sep-1988 |
| Test Date: | 7-Jul-1988 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing 8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing 31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing |
Result 111 of 83
| Test Id: | 113 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Three Rivers Ice Cream |
| File Size: | 6.057 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Aug-1988 |
| Test Date: | 25-May-1988 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.8% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO testing 13.2% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 22.6% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via HC testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via HC testing |
Result 112 of 83
| Test Id: | 139 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Tri-County Transit |
| File Size: | 9.575 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Feb-1991 |
| Test Date: | 8-Aug-1990 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.1% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 70.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 1.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 22.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing |
Result 113 of 83
| Test Id: | 5 |
|---|---|
| Title: | UP&L |
| File Size: | 6.749 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 9-May-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 9 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 28.8% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 25.2% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -2.6% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via HC testing |
Result 114 of 83
| Test Id: | 21 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp |
| File Size: | 39.809 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing |
Result 115 of 83
| Test Id: | 9 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light Scenic |
| File Size: | 6.994 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 27-Jul-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing |
Result 116 of 83
| Test Id: | 115 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Vogel Disposal |
| File Size: | 10.107 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 9-Dec-1987 |
| Test Date: | 28-Nov-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 117 of 83
| Test Id: | 117 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wal-Mart |
| File Size: | 34.933 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 6-Mar-1995 |
| Test Date: | 1-Mar-1995 |
| Test Location: | Arkansas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -42.2% average improvement on 3 Detroit S-60 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via CO2 testing -2.4% average improvement on 4 Detroit S-60 engines via HC testing |
Result 118 of 83
| Test Id: | 116 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Walbon Transit |
| File Size: | 0.033 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Oct-1995 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1995 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 235 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 119 of 83
| Test Id: | 118 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Waste Management of Dallas |
| File Size: | 36.117 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Jun-1995 |
| Test Date: | 25-Apr-1995 |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.0% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 11.5% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.2% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 0.8% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 120 of 83
| Test Id: | 119 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wayne W. Sell Corporation |
| File Size: | 10.465 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1987 |
| Test Date: | 19-Nov-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 121 of 83
| Test Id: | 15 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wepher Marine |
| File Size: | 6.407 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 16-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via CO2 testing 29.1% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 122 of 83
| Test Id: | 19 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Willamette & Pacific |
| File Size: | 46.817 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-1995 |
| Test Date: | 1-Feb-1995 |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -22.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing 1.5% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 18.6% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 123 of 83
| Test Id: | 3 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Wisconsin Central |
| File Size: | 53.768 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 19-Aug-1996 |
| Test Date: | 14-Aug-1996 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.9% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO testing 1.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 5.2% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 8.4% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engine via CO2 testing -18.5% average improvement on 7 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via HC testing 10.2% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via HC testing 17.8% average improvement on 10 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 27.5% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show previous 10 documents |