FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 67 documents that match your query. These 67 documents contain a total of 1,430 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 31 of 67

Test Id: 8
Title: A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine
File Size: 33.744 MB
Industries: Mining, Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 17-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing
-1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing
11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing
11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing
29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing
91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing
22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing
57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 32 of 67

Test Id: 69
Title: Alaska Railroad Corporation
File Size: 72.735 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Nov-1995
Test Date: 16-Sep-1995
Test Location: Alaska, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing
5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing
-13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing
24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 33 of 67

Test Id: 78
Title: Andhra Pradesh
File Size: 9.721 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Oct-1994
Test Date: 28-Oct-1994
Test Location: Andhra Pradesh, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing
9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing
10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing
18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing
7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing
0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 34 of 67

Test Id: 79
Title: BEC-allwaste
File Size: 22.693 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 15-Sep-1996
Test Date: 10-Jul-1996
Test Location: Alabama, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing
0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing
-3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing
17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing
-1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing
13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing
14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing
11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing
10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing
9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing
14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing
42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing
29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing
19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing
29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing
36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing
20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 35 of 67

Test Id: 14
Title: Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station
File Size: 13.352 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1992
Test Date: 25-Oct-1992
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing
-45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
-10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing
7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing
38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 36 of 67

Test Id: 80
Title: BFI Holding
File Size: 16.594 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 18-Nov-1994
Test Date: 7-Sep-1994
Test Location: Duiven, Netherlands
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing
1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing
32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing
24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing
19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing
35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing
26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing
26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing
1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing
12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing
9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing
8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing
9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing
8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing
-7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing
1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing
23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing
-24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing
4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing
10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing
0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing
3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing
0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing
4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing
14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing
12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing
12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing
-14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing
15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing
45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing
28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 37 of 67

Test Id: 39
Title: Big Bell Mine
File Size: 0.051 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-1999
Test Date: 16-Aug-1999
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 38 of 67

Test Id: 40
Title: Blue Circle Cement
File Size: 0.067 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1997
Test Date: 1-Mar-1997
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.5% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
2.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Smoke Spot testing
Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped):
-7.7% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Withdrawal testing

Result 39 of 67

Test Id: 81
Title: Boise Urban Stages
File Size: 6.812 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Aug-1993
Test Date: 1-Aug-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing
5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing
-2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing
52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing
0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing
33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 40 of 67

Test Id: 82
Title: Brambles Trucking
File Size: 0.488 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 13-Feb-1992
Test Date: 14-Nov-1991
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing
23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing
20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 41 of 67

Test Id: 83
Title: Broward County Schools
File Size: 14.875 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 4-Apr-1995
Test Date: 28-Oct-1994
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.1% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins B engines via CO testing
21.2% average improvement on 3 Navistar 444 engines via CO testing
19.6% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO testing
-9.4% average improvement on 2 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO testing
5.4% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via CO2 testing
1.9% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via CO2 testing
3.8% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO2 testing
4.2% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO2 testing
-18.2% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via HC testing
7.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via HC testing
15.5% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via HC testing
-36.5% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via HC testing
13.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Smoke Spot testing
20.0% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Smoke Spot testing
15.3% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 42 of 67

Test Id: 130
Title: Canada ESDC (SFAT Development) Tests
File Size: 2.481 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1998
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Quebec, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
3.9% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via CO testing
1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 43 of 67

Test Id: 187
Title: Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway
File Size: 26.822 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2000
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing
43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing
11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 44 of 67

Test Id: 41
Title: Central Norsman
File Size: 0.095 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2004
Test Date: 21-Apr-2004
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 45 of 67

Test Id: 6
Title: Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad
File Size: 13.241 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 16-Nov-1998
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.4% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 46 of 67

Test Id: 85
Title: Cheran Transport
File Size: 24.740 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Jun-1994
Test Date: 11-Feb-1994
Test Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.5% average improvement on 9 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
18.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 6-65 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.9% improvement on a Viking BW engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
1.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing
12.0% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via CO2 testing
2.5% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing
-12.6% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing
20.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via HC testing
10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing
35.0% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 47 of 67

Test Id: 89
Title: Coca-Cola Bottling
File Size: 18.379 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 11-Oct-1994
Test Date: 11-Jul-1994
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing
0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing
17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
-2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing
0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing
14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 48 of 67

Test Id: 12
Title: Cominco Alaska Red Dog Mine Powerhouse
File Size: 73.385 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Feb-1995
Test Date: 18-Jan-1995
Test Location: Alaska, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.1% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
9.0% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO testing
3.7% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO2 testing
13.6% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via HC testing
20.0% improvement on a Wartsila 16V32 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 49 of 67

Test Id: 43
Title: Darlot Gold Mine
File Size: 0.031 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-2006
Test Date: 26-Jul-2006
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.8% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
14.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 50 of 67

Test Id: 213
Title: Darlot Gold Mine Power Generation
File Size: 0.163 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Dec-2006
Test Date: 25-Sep-2006
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Smoke Spot testing
7.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3516 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 51 of 67

Test Id: 18
Title: Devall Diesel
File Size: 5.236 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2000
Test Date: 5-Jun-2000
Test Location: Louisiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing
22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing
-28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing
31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 52 of 67

Test Id: 92
Title: Distribution Trucking Company
File Size: 9.884 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Jan-1994
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing
-5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing
9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing
9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing
7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing
13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
-8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing
18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing
7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing
17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing
17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing
11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing
11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 53 of 67

Test Id: 44
Title: Dominion Mining
File Size: 12.589 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 27-May-1994
Test Date: 30-Mar-1994
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 54 of 67

Test Id: 211
Title: Echo Bay Mining
File Size: 22.349 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 23-Nov-1994
Test Date: 29-Mar-1994
Test Location: Nevada, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing
4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing
5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing
16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing
33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing
19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing
28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing
9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 55 of 67

Test Id: 93
Title: EG&G Idaho
File Size: 7.940 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Aug-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing
-1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing
43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 56 of 67

Test Id: 131
Title: ESDC (RP-503, SFAT, AAR 3-Mode) Report for Go Transit
File Size: 0.149 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-Feb-2003
Test Date: 11-Feb-2003
Test Location: Quebec, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.5% average improvement on 3 EMD 710G3A engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
2.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via CO testing
5.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 57 of 67

Test Id: 63
Title: Esperance Port Authority
File Size: 0.138 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2001
Test Date: 5-Jul-2001
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
0.6% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
36.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 58 of 67

Test Id: 152
Title: Farm Development Corporation
File Size: 1.237 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Aug-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
95.0% improvement on a Kewanee Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 59 of 67

Test Id: 45
Title: FMC Mining
File Size: 12.303 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 16-Dec-1994
Test Date: 1-Jun-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
16.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing
Engine Life/Maintenance Results:
31.8% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Wear Metals testing
34.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Wear Metals testing
12.2% improvement on a Caterpillar D10N engine via Wear Metals testing
-13.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins TD25G engines via Wear Metals testing
13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Wear Metals testing

Result 60 of 67

Test Id: 188
Title: FMC Testimonial
File Size: 0.069 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Testimonial
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 29-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
15.0% improvement on an engine via CO testing
40.0% improvement on an engine via HC testing
16.0% improvement on an engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 61 of 67

Test Id: 94
Title: FMC, Dry Valley Mine
File Size: 3.820 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Aug-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 62 of 67

Test Id: 20
Title: Freight Australia
File Size: 5.570 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-2000
Test Date: 23-Jul-2000
Test Location: Southern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.2% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
34.9% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 63 of 67

Test Id: 7
Title: Freight Corp.
File Size: 6.225 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emission credit, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2000
Test Date: 25-May-2000
Test Location: Southern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
42.6% average improvement on 2 EMD 710G3A engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 64 of 67

Test Id: 153
Title: Furnace Evaluation
File Size: 4.734 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 29-Dec-1981
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
100.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 65 of 67

Test Id: 72
Title: Geneva Steel
File Size: 7.723 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 22-Feb-1999
Test Date: 12-Apr-1997
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing
-8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing
7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing
19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing
89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing
22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing
11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing
17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 66 of 67

Test Id: 55
Title: Granny Smith Mine
File Size: 0.091 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jun-1999
Test Date: 12-Apr-1999
Test Location: New South Wales, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 67 of 67

Test Id: 98
Title: Gujarat
File Size: 21.654 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Jun-1994
Test Date: 11-Feb-1992
Test Location: Gujarat, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.9% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.4% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.9% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
2.3% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via CO2 testing
-0.8% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing
-4.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing
17.3% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via HC testing
10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing
22.5% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing
33.0% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Smoke Spot testing
43.0% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 68 of 67

Test Id: 99
Title: Hillsborough County School
File Size: 46.021 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 11-Aug-1994
Test Date: 5-Apr-1994
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.8% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.9% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO testing
20.9% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO testing
16.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing
5.5% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO2 testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO2 testing
6.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing
10.3% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via HC testing
-22.4% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via HC testing
11.6% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing
17.0% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Smoke Spot testing
41.0% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a International DT466 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 69 of 67

Test Id: 178
Title: Indiana Harbor Belt RR
File Size: 3.366 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Testimonial
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 25-Feb-1998
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Indiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
7.7% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
7.7% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.0% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Smoke Spot testing
21.0% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Smoke Spot testing
21.0% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 70 of 67

Test Id: 24
Title: Interlink Express
File Size: 9.470 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 14-Dec-1995
Test Date: 19-Jul-1995
Test Location: England, England
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing
-16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing
8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing
6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing
17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing
-1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing
23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing
23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 71 of 67

Test Id: 155
Title: K.D. Perdana
File Size: 15.724 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 1-Feb-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
28.7% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Smoke Spot testing
Engine Life/Maintenance Results:
66.1% average improvement on 2 Mercedes Genset engines via Wear Metals testing
26.6% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Wear Metals testing

Result 72 of 67

Test Id: 49
Title: Kennecott Copper
File Size: 26.441 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Apr-1995
Test Date: 27-Feb-1995
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing
-7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing
6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing
3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing
5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing
24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing
12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing
6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 73 of 67

Test Id: 74
Title: Kyle Railroad
File Size: 22.532 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 6-Dec-1995
Test Date: 1-Jun-1995
Test Location: Kansas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.3% average improvement on 9 GE U30C-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.1% average improvement on 17 GE U30C-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 74 of 67

Test Id: 104
Title: Laidlaw Bus
File Size: 13.087 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 23-May-1996
Test Date: 27-Mar-1996
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing
42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing
23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing
15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing
5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing
5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing
7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing
6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing
8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing
-1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing
30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing
-0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing
18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing
7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing
43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing
40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing
45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 75 of 67

Test Id: 105
Title: Lusk
File Size: 21.380 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 20-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing
11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
-46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing
20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing
56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 76 of 67

Test Id: 50
Title: MacMahon
File Size: 0.069 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1997
Test Date: 18-Mar-1997
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.4% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 630E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.8% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a Komatsu 785-3 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
29.0% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 630E engines via Smoke Spot testing
27.7% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 77 of 67

Test Id: 51
Title: Magma Copper
File Size: 21.964 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 18-May-1994
Test Date: 14-Apr-1994
Test Location: Arizona, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing
8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing
12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing
21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 78 of 67

Test Id: 106
Title: Manitowac Transit
File Size: 6.773 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions
Fuels: 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-May-1996
Test Date: 21-May-1996
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
26.9% average improvement on 3 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
36.1% average improvement on 3 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 79 of 67

Test Id: 46
Title: Marandoo Mine
File Size: 0.223 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2003
Test Date: 13-May-2003
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.6% average improvement on 2 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
25.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 80 of 67

Test Id: 205
Title: Montana Rail Link and Washington Central Railroad Company
File Size: 26.818 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Dec-1996
Test Date: 1-Oct-1996
Test Location: Washington, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% average improvement on 4 EMD SD9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
26.9% average improvement on 4 EMD SD9 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 81 of 67

Test Id: 35
Title: Mt. Keith Mine
File Size: 0.235 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-2005
Test Date: 26-Jul-2005
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 793C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
26.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 82 of 67

Test Id: 64
Title: North Flinders
File Size: 0.165 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1989
Test Date: 6-May-1989
Test Location: Southern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing
3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing
54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing
33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 83 of 67

Test Id: 37
Title: Norwich Park Mine
File Size: 0.187 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Feb-1990
Test Date: 1-Oct-1989
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
27.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Smoke Spot testing
Engine Life/Maintenance Results:
12.6% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 777D engines via Oil Consumption testing
44.0% average improvement on 12 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Oil Consumption testing
33.0% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Wear Metals testing

Result 84 of 67

Test Id: 75
Title: Pacific National RR
File Size: 0.257 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Oct-2009
Test Date: 12-Oct-2009
Test Location: New South Wales, Australia
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
46.5% average improvement on 4 EMD GT46CWM engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 85 of 67

Test Id: 56
Title: Paddington
File Size: 0.099 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2005
Test Date: 21-Mar-2005
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.2% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
29.3% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 86 of 67

Test Id: 157
Title: Peak Downs mine
File Size: 7.699 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1991
Test Date: 28-Aug-1990
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing
21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing
43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing
33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 87 of 67

Test Id: 26
Title: Provo City
File Size: 51.613 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date: 12-Sep-1995
Test Date: 12-Jun-1995
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing
8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing
-19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing
15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing
22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing
3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing
3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing
9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing
9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing
9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing
32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing
37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing
8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing
5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing
33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing
21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing
22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 88 of 67

Test Id: 222
Title: Royal Caribbean
File Size: 4.725 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 14-May-2012
Test Date: 8-Apr-2012
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing
4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing
20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing
38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 89 of 67

Test Id: 47
Title: Smoky Canyon Mine
File Size: 7.162 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Wyoming, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing
0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing
9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing
7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 90 of 67

Test Id: 112
Title: T.G. Lee Foods, Inc
File Size: 13.442 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Oct-1995
Test Date: 25-Oct-1995
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing
8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 91 of 67

Test Id: 116
Title: Walbon Transit
File Size: 0.033 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Oct-1995
Test Date: 1-Sep-1995
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 235 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
15.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via CO testing
40.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 92 of 67

Test Id: 118
Title: Waste Management of Dallas
File Size: 36.117 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-Jun-1995
Test Date: 25-Apr-1995
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.0% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
11.5% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
3.2% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
0.8% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
22.4% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 93 of 67

Test Id: 15
Title: Wepher Marine
File Size: 6.407 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 16-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Tennessee, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing
5.4% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via CO2 testing
29.1% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing
8.3% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 94 of 67

Test Id: 38
Title: Wesfarmers Coal
File Size: 0.176 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2001
Test Date: 3-Jul-2001
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.0% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.2% improvement on a Komatsu 149 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
18.3% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing
8.0% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 149 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 95 of 67

Test Id: 19
Title: Willamette & Pacific
File Size: 46.817 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1995
Test Date: 1-Feb-1995
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-22.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing
3.7% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing
1.5% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via HC testing
18.6% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 96 of 67

Test Id: 3
Title: Wisconsin Central
File Size: 53.768 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 19-Aug-1996
Test Date: 14-Aug-1996
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.9% average improvement on 5 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.6% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.9% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO testing
1.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing
5.2% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing
8.4% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing
6.5% improvement on a EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engine via CO2 testing
-18.5% average improvement on 7 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via HC testing
10.2% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via HC testing
17.8% average improvement on 10 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing
27.5% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing
22.0% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 97 of 67

Test Id: 62
Title: Worsley Alumina
File Size: 0.101 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-2004
Test Date: 23-Jul-2003
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.8% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 985 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.2% average improvement on 5 Komatsu 985 engines via Smoke Spot testing
Show previous 10 documents