Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 82 documents that match your query. These 82 documents contain a total of 1,852 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 32 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 35 different engine manufacturers
- 114 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 46 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.652%
- 422 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.137%
- 11 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.600%
- 215 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.273%
- 16 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.484%
- 367 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.864%
- 406 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.562%
- 369 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.652%
Result 51 of 82
Test Id: | 68 |
---|---|
Title: | M.S.Conus |
File Size: | 3.148 MB |
Industries: | Boiler, Marine |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 |
Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 |
Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing |
Result 52 of 82
Test Id: | 51 |
---|---|
Title: | Magma Copper |
File Size: | 21.964 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 18-May-1994 |
Test Date: | 14-Apr-1994 |
Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing 12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing 21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 53 of 82
Test Id: | 107 |
---|---|
Title: | Memphis Cablevision |
File Size: | 0.655 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 27-Dec-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 11.8% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 17.4% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via CO2 testing 12.4% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via HC testing 29.6% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via HC testing |
Result 54 of 82
Test Id: | 64 |
---|---|
Title: | North Flinders ![]() |
File Size: | 0.165 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-1989 |
Test Date: | 6-May-1989 |
Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 55 of 82
Test Id: | 53 |
---|---|
Title: | Occidental Chemical |
File Size: | 0.038 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing |
Result 56 of 82
Test Id: | 157 |
---|---|
Title: | Peak Downs mine |
File Size: | 7.699 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-1991 |
Test Date: | 28-Aug-1990 |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing 43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing 33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 57 of 82
Test Id: | 26 |
---|---|
Title: | Provo City |
File Size: | 51.613 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 12-Sep-1995 |
Test Date: | 12-Jun-1995 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing -19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing 22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing 3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing 32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing 5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing 33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing 21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 58 of 82
Test Id: | 65 |
---|---|
Title: | RedBank Power ![]() |
File Size: | 0.228 MB |
Industries: | Generators |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | |
Report Date: | 1-Nov-1983 |
Test Date: | 12-Oct-1983 |
Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing 4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing |
Result 59 of 82
Test Id: | 136 |
---|---|
Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
File Size: | 3.684 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 60 of 82
Test Id: | 222 |
---|---|
Title: | Royal Caribbean |
File Size: | 4.725 MB |
Industries: | Marine |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
Report Date: | 14-May-2012 |
Test Date: | 8-Apr-2012 |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |