FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 82 documents that match your query. These 82 documents contain a total of 1,852 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 61 of 82

Test Id: 58
Title: San Juan Coal
File Size: 3.470 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jan-1985
Test Date: 1-Aug-1984
Test Location: New Mexico, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing
13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing
98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing

Result 62 of 82

Test Id: 47
Title: Smoky Canyon Mine
File Size: 7.162 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Wyoming, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing
0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing
9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing
7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 63 of 82

Test Id: 204
Title: Southwest Research EPA Emissions
File Size: 2.017 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions
Fuels: Gasoline
Report Date: 1-Jun-1997
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
18.8% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via CO testing
7.6% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via HC testing
9.9% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via NOx testing

Result 64 of 82

Test Id: 171
Title: Southwest Research RP-503
File Size: 0.353 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jul-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.7% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
6.5% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via CO testing
4.6% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via HC testing
-3.8% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via NOx testing
Notes: This test was conducted on a clean, new EMD 12-645E3B.

Result 65 of 82

Test Id: 135
Title: System Controls
File Size: 4.432 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: Gasoline
Report Date: 28-May-1982
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: California, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet V8 engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.1% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via CO testing
1.3% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via HC testing
-2.0% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via NOx testing

Result 66 of 82

Test Id: 112
Title: T.G. Lee Foods, Inc
File Size: 13.442 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Oct-1995
Test Date: 25-Oct-1995
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing
8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 67 of 82

Test Id: 166
Title: The Metropolitan Transit Authority
File Size: 5.507 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 23-Dec-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Alabama, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing
45.2% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing

Result 68 of 82

Test Id: 167
Title: The Tennessee Department of Transportation
File Size: 5.206 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 22-Dec-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Tennessee, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
19.7% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
20.6% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.3% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
30.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing
32.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via HC testing
32.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via HC testing
32.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via HC testing
32.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via HC testing
32.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing

Result 69 of 82

Test Id: 2
Title: Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco)
File Size: 7.716 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Sep-1988
Test Date: 7-Jul-1988
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing
8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing
31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing

Result 70 of 82

Test Id: 113
Title: Three Rivers Ice Cream
File Size: 6.057 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Aug-1988
Test Date: 25-May-1988
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.3% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.7% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.8% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO testing
13.2% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO2 testing
10.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing
22.6% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via HC testing
14.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via HC testing
Show previous 10 documents Show all documents on one page Show next 10 documents