Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 22 documents that match your query. These 22 documents contain a total of 228 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 9 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 9 different engine manufacturers
- 19 different engine types
- 9 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 47 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.738%
- 55 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.533%
- 3 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.293%
- 24 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 13.529%
- 2 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.865%
- 37 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.358%
- 31 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 26.672%
- 28 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.822%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 11 of 22
| Test Id: | 63 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Esperance Port Authority |
| File Size: | 0.138 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2001 |
| Test Date: | 5-Jul-2001 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 36.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 12 of 22
| Test Id: | 55 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Granny Smith Mine |
| File Size: | 0.091 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1999 |
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1999 |
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 13 of 22
| Test Id: | 64 |
|---|---|
| Title: | North Flinders 
|
| File Size: | 0.165 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1989 |
| Test Date: | 6-May-1989 |
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 14 of 22
| Test Id: | 54 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Osborne Mines |
| File Size: | 27.664 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jul-2000 |
| Test Date: | 7-Jun-2000 |
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 12V32E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 15 of 22
| Test Id: | 158 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Perilya Mines Fortnum Gold Mine |
| File Size: | 12.006 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1996 |
| Test Date: | 21-Nov-1996 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 16 of 22
| Test Id: | 133 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Perugia Italy |
| File Size: | 0.029 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.3% average improvement on 3 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.8% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO testing 0.2% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO2 testing |
Result 17 of 22
| Test Id: | 65 |
|---|---|
| Title: | RedBank Power
|
| File Size: | 0.228 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1983 |
| Test Date: | 12-Oct-1983 |
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing 4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing |
Result 18 of 22
| Test Id: | 136 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
| File Size: | 3.684 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 19 of 22
| Test Id: | 127 |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Plus Factor |
| File Size: | 2.690 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Generators, Mining, Railroad, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Publication |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2008 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 20 of 22
| Test Id: | 5 |
|---|---|
| Title: | UP&L |
| File Size: | 6.749 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 9-May-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 9 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 28.8% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 25.2% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -2.6% average improvement on 2 Detroit 8.2 engines via HC testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |