Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 190 documents that match your query. These 190 documents contain a total of 2,488 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 48 locations
- 7 different industries
- 5 different fuel types
- 52 different engine manufacturers
- 185 different engine types
- 12 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 205 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.040%
- 642 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.132%
- 48 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.875%
- 309 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.902%
- 14 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.561%
- 387 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.561%
- 404 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.582%
- 424 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.875%
- 23 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 26.000%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 12 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -5.642%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 141 of 190
| Test Id: | 65 |
|---|---|
| Title: | RedBank Power 
|
| File Size: | 0.228 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1983 |
| Test Date: | 12-Oct-1983 |
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing 4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing |
Result 142 of 190
| Test Id: | 143 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rempel Bros |
| File Size: | 0.026 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 17-Nov-2009 |
| Test Date: | 3-Nov-2009 |
| Test Location: | Vancouver, Canada |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% average improvement on 13 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 143 of 190
| Test Id: | 122 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Residential Boiler |
| File Size: | 0.027 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.0% average improvement on 2 Amer.Furnace M 175-C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 12.4% improvement on a Carrier 38M-105K401 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 3.1% improvement on a Crane MP-1192 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 1.6% improvement on a Hallmark engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 144 of 190
| Test Id: | 136 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
| File Size: | 3.684 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 145 of 190
| Test Id: | 195 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rockdale County Schools |
| File Size: | 0.042 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Georgia, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 11.0% average improvement on 8 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 146 of 190
| Test Id: | 222 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Royal Caribbean |
| File Size: | 4.725 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 14-May-2012 |
| Test Date: | 8-Apr-2012 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 147 of 190
| Test Id: | 196 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Sadler |
| File Size: | 0.177 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 148 of 190
| Test Id: | 58 |
|---|---|
| Title: | San Juan Coal |
| File Size: | 3.470 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
| Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 149 of 190
| Test Id: | 197 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Schultz Express |
| File Size: | 0.019 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 17-Apr-2006 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Iowa, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 11.9% average improvement on 2 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 150 of 190
| Test Id: | 47 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
| File Size: | 7.162 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |