Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 54 documents that match your query. These 54 documents contain a total of 536 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 14 locations
- 1 industry
- 3 different fuel types
- 14 different engine manufacturers
- 52 different engine types
- 11 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 63 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.700%
- 115 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.055%
- 11 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.279%
- 91 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.455%
- 2 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.865%
- 66 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 15.001%
- 59 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.681%
- 65 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.082%
- 33 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 29.352%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 12 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -5.642%
Result 1 of 54
Test Id: | 8 |
---|---|
Title: | A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine |
File Size: | 33.744 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Railroad |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
Test Date: | 17-Apr-1994 |
Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing -1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing 11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing 11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing 29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing 91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing 57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 2 of 54
Test Id: | 148 |
---|---|
Title: | AWP Contractors |
File Size: | 14.240 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-1996 |
Test Date: | 11-Jan-1996 |
Test Location: | Alberta, Canada |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 777C engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 6.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 785B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 3 of 54
Test Id: | 39 |
---|---|
Title: | Big Bell Mine |
File Size: | 0.051 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-1999 |
Test Date: | 16-Aug-1999 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 4 of 54
Test Id: | 40 |
---|---|
Title: | Blue Circle Cement |
File Size: | 0.067 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-1997 |
Test Date: | 1-Mar-1997 |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Smoke Spot testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -7.7% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Withdrawal testing |
Result 5 of 54
Test Id: | 42 |
---|---|
Title: | Boral |
File Size: | 0.119 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-1998 |
Test Date: | 11-May-1998 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 6 of 54
Test Id: | 41 |
---|---|
Title: | Central Norsman |
File Size: | 0.095 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-2004 |
Test Date: | 21-Apr-2004 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 7 of 54
Test Id: | 43 |
---|---|
Title: | Darlot Gold Mine |
File Size: | 0.031 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-2006 |
Test Date: | 26-Jul-2006 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 8 of 54
Test Id: | 213 |
---|---|
Title: | Darlot Gold Mine Power Generation |
File Size: | 0.163 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Dec-2006 |
Test Date: | 25-Sep-2006 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Smoke Spot testing 7.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3516 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 9 of 54
Test Id: | 44 |
---|---|
Title: | Dominion Mining |
File Size: | 12.589 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 27-May-1994 |
Test Date: | 30-Mar-1994 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 10 of 54
Test Id: | 123 |
---|---|
Title: | Earth Moving |
File Size: | 6.384 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jun-1990 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 11 of 54
Test Id: | 211 |
---|---|
Title: | Echo Bay Mining |
File Size: | 22.349 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 23-Nov-1994 |
Test Date: | 29-Mar-1994 |
Test Location: | Nevada, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 12 of 54
Test Id: | 57 |
---|---|
Title: | Fimiston Open Pit |
File Size: | 0.117 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-1997 |
Test Date: | 28-Jun-1997 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -4.0% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Withdrawal testing |
Result 13 of 54
Test Id: | 45 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC Mining |
File Size: | 12.303 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 16-Dec-1994 |
Test Date: | 1-Jun-1993 |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 31.8% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Wear Metals testing 34.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Wear Metals testing 12.2% improvement on a Caterpillar D10N engine via Wear Metals testing -13.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins TD25G engines via Wear Metals testing 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Wear Metals testing |
Result 14 of 54
Test Id: | 188 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.069 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Sep-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on an engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on an engine via HC testing 16.0% improvement on an engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 15 of 54
Test Id: | 94 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC, Dry Valley Mine |
File Size: | 3.820 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Aug-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 16 of 54
Test Id: | 95 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC, Skull Point Field Trial |
File Size: | 28.206 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 26-Jun-1994 |
Test Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing |
Result 17 of 54
Test Id: | 173 |
---|---|
Title: | Fuel Technology |
File Size: | 10.129 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Biocide, Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 18 of 54
Test Id: | 1 |
---|---|
Title: | Giralambone |
File Size: | 10.358 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Nov-1996 |
Test Date: | 11-Sep-1996 |
Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 19 of 54
Test Id: | 33 |
---|---|
Title: | Goldsworthy Mine |
File Size: | 5.738 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Railroad |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 8-Jun-1992 |
Test Date: | 1-Apr-1991 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -6.1% average improvement on 2 English-Electric 12CSVT engines via Withdrawal testing -0.8% improvement on a English-Electric 6CSRKT engine via Withdrawal testing |
Result 20 of 54
Test Id: | 34 |
---|---|
Title: | Goonyella |
File Size: | 0.131 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jan-2001 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 784B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 6.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 793B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 21 of 54
Test Id: | 31 |
---|---|
Title: | Granny Smith |
File Size: | 8.783 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jul-1993 |
Test Date: | 15-May-1993 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 22 of 54
Test Id: | 55 |
---|---|
Title: | Granny Smith Mine |
File Size: | 0.091 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jun-1999 |
Test Date: | 12-Apr-1999 |
Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 23 of 54
Test Id: | 32 |
---|---|
Title: | Kanowna-Belle |
File Size: | 8.479 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-1997 |
Test Date: | 3-Apr-1997 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777D engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 24 of 54
Test Id: | 48 |
---|---|
Title: | KCGM Super Pit |
File Size: | 0.187 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2003 |
Test Date: | 19-Jul-2003 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 25 of 54
Test Id: | 49 |
---|---|
Title: | Kennecott Copper |
File Size: | 26.441 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Apr-1995 |
Test Date: | 27-Feb-1995 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 26 of 54
Test Id: | 50 |
---|---|
Title: | MacMahon |
File Size: | 0.069 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-1997 |
Test Date: | 18-Mar-1997 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 630E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a Komatsu 785-3 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.0% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 630E engines via Smoke Spot testing 27.7% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 27 of 54
Test Id: | 51 |
---|---|
Title: | Magma Copper |
File Size: | 21.964 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 18-May-1994 |
Test Date: | 14-Apr-1994 |
Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing 12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing 21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 28 of 54
Test Id: | 46 |
---|---|
Title: | Marandoo Mine |
File Size: | 0.223 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2003 |
Test Date: | 13-May-2003 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.6% average improvement on 2 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 25.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 29 of 54
Test Id: | 219 |
---|---|
Title: | MES Dyno tests |
File Size: | 0.535 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Apr-2012 |
Test Date: | 20-Feb-2012 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar C11 DI TA AAAC 353hp engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 30 of 54
Test Id: | 29 |
---|---|
Title: | Mid Florida Mining |
File Size: | 2.846 MB |
Industries: | Boiler, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
Report Date: | 22-Jul-1991 |
Test Date: | 12-Apr-1991 |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 38.1% improvement on a Boiler engine via CO testing |
Result 31 of 54
Test Id: | 218 |
---|---|
Title: | Mina La Herradura |
File Size: | 1.354 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 22-Nov-2011 |
Test Date: | 22-Nov-2011 |
Test Location: | Mexico, Mexico |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 789C engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 32 of 54
Test Id: | 35 |
---|---|
Title: | Mt. Keith Mine |
File Size: | 0.235 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-2005 |
Test Date: | 26-Jul-2005 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 793C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 33 of 54
Test Id: | 36 |
---|---|
Title: | Mt. Whaleback Mine |
File Size: | 0.147 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Feb-2002 |
Test Date: | 18-Dec-2001 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 789 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 34 of 54
Test Id: | 64 |
---|---|
Title: | North Flinders ![]() |
File Size: | 0.165 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-1989 |
Test Date: | 6-May-1989 |
Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 35 of 54
Test Id: | 37 |
---|---|
Title: | Norwich Park Mine |
File Size: | 0.187 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Feb-1990 |
Test Date: | 1-Oct-1989 |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 12.6% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 777D engines via Oil Consumption testing 44.0% average improvement on 12 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Oil Consumption testing 33.0% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Wear Metals testing |
Result 36 of 54
Test Id: | 53 |
---|---|
Title: | Occidental Chemical |
File Size: | 0.038 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing |
Result 37 of 54
Test Id: | 54 |
---|---|
Title: | Osborne Mines |
File Size: | 27.664 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jul-2000 |
Test Date: | 7-Jun-2000 |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 12V32E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 38 of 54
Test Id: | 56 |
---|---|
Title: | Paddington |
File Size: | 0.099 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-2005 |
Test Date: | 21-Mar-2005 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.3% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 39 of 54
Test Id: | 157 |
---|---|
Title: | Peak Downs mine |
File Size: | 7.699 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-1991 |
Test Date: | 28-Aug-1990 |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing 43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing 33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 40 of 54
Test Id: | 158 |
---|---|
Title: | Perilya Mines Fortnum Gold Mine |
File Size: | 12.006 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Dec-1996 |
Test Date: | 21-Nov-1996 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 41 of 54
Test Id: | 136 |
---|---|
Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
File Size: | 3.684 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 42 of 54
Test Id: | 58 |
---|---|
Title: | San Juan Coal |
File Size: | 3.470 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 43 of 54
Test Id: | 47 |
---|---|
Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
File Size: | 7.162 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 44 of 54
Test Id: | 198 |
---|---|
Title: | South African Case study testimonial |
File Size: | 0.111 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 7-Jul-2010 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 2 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 45 of 54
Test Id: | 169 |
---|---|
Title: | Summary of Wear Metals Smoky Canyon Mine |
File Size: | 25.929 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 9-May-1994 |
Test Date: | 1-Jul-1992 |
Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
Summary: | Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 37.1% average improvement on 10 Caterpillar 785 engines via Wear Metals testing |
Result 46 of 54
Test Id: | 59 |
---|---|
Title: | Tarong Coal |
File Size: | 0.078 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Feb-2002 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.2% average improvement on 4 MTU 12v 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 47 of 54
Test Id: | 52 |
---|---|
Title: | Telfer Mine |
File Size: | 0.063 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Dec-1998 |
Test Date: | 16-Nov-1998 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 785B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 48 of 54
Test Id: | 127 |
---|---|
Title: | The Plus Factor |
File Size: | 2.690 MB |
Industries: | Boiler, Generators, Mining, Railroad, Trucking |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2008 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 49 of 54
Test Id: | 60 |
---|---|
Title: | Thiess Contractors |
File Size: | 0.177 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Dec-2001 |
Test Date: | 15-Nov-2001 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 785C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 50 of 54
Test Id: | 21 |
---|---|
Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp |
File Size: | 39.809 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 |
Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing |
Result 51 of 54
Test Id: | 9 |
---|---|
Title: | Utah Power and Light Scenic |
File Size: | 6.994 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 27-Jul-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing |
Result 52 of 54
Test Id: | 61 |
---|---|
Title: | Vulcan Minerals |
File Size: | 0.070 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions |
Fuels: | |
Report Date: | 20-Jan-1998 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 53 of 54
Test Id: | 38 |
---|---|
Title: | Wesfarmers Coal |
File Size: | 0.176 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2001 |
Test Date: | 3-Jul-2001 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Komatsu 149 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.3% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 149 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 54 of 54
Test Id: | 62 |
---|---|
Title: | Worsley Alumina |
File Size: | 0.101 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-2004 |
Test Date: | 23-Jul-2003 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 985 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.2% average improvement on 5 Komatsu 985 engines via Smoke Spot testing |