FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 108 documents that match your query. These 108 documents contain a total of 2,214 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 31 of 108

Test Id: 18
Title: Devall Diesel
File Size: 5.236 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2000
Test Date: 5-Jun-2000
Test Location: Louisiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing
22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing
-28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing
31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 32 of 108

Test Id: 92
Title: Distribution Trucking Company
File Size: 9.884 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Jan-1994
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing
-5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing
9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing
9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing
7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing
13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
-8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing
18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing
7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing
17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing
17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing
11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing
11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 33 of 108

Test Id: 44
Title: Dominion Mining
File Size: 12.589 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 27-May-1994
Test Date: 30-Mar-1994
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 34 of 108

Test Id: 211
Title: Echo Bay Mining
File Size: 22.349 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 23-Nov-1994
Test Date: 29-Mar-1994
Test Location: Nevada, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing
4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing
5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing
16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing
33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing
19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing
28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing
9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 35 of 108

Test Id: 93
Title: EG&G Idaho
File Size: 7.940 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Aug-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing
-1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing
43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 36 of 108

Test Id: 28
Title: EPA Exhaust Emissions
File Size: 7.937 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: Gasoline
Report Date: 12-Aug-1981
Test Date: 17-Jun-1981
Test Location: Colorado, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.2% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.3% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.1% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via CO testing
27.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via CO testing
21.4% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via HC testing
-4.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via HC testing
-3.3% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via NOx testing
7.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via NOx testing

Result 37 of 108

Test Id: 63
Title: Esperance Port Authority
File Size: 0.138 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2001
Test Date: 5-Jul-2001
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
0.6% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
36.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 38 of 108

Test Id: 45
Title: FMC Mining
File Size: 12.303 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 16-Dec-1994
Test Date: 1-Jun-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
16.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing
Engine Life/Maintenance Results:
31.8% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Wear Metals testing
34.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Wear Metals testing
12.2% improvement on a Caterpillar D10N engine via Wear Metals testing
-13.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins TD25G engines via Wear Metals testing
13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Wear Metals testing

Result 39 of 108

Test Id: 94
Title: FMC, Dry Valley Mine
File Size: 3.820 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Aug-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 40 of 108

Test Id: 95
Title: FMC, Skull Point Field Trial
File Size: 28.206 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 26-Jun-1994
Test Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Location: Wyoming, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing
6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing
10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing
65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing
-0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing
6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing
2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing
11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing
64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing
19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing
4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing
Show previous 10 documents Show all documents on one page Show next 10 documents