Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 82 documents that match your query. These 82 documents contain a total of 1,852 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 32 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 35 different engine manufacturers
- 114 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 46 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.652%
- 422 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.137%
- 11 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.600%
- 215 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.273%
- 16 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.484%
- 367 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.864%
- 406 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.562%
- 369 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.652%
Result 21 of 82
| Test Id: | 89 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Coca-Cola Bottling |
| File Size: | 18.379 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 11-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 11-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing 0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing 17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 22 of 82
| Test Id: | 12 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Cominco Alaska Red Dog Mine Powerhouse |
| File Size: | 73.385 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Feb-1995 |
| Test Date: | 18-Jan-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.1% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 9.0% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO testing 3.7% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO2 testing 13.6% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via HC testing 20.0% improvement on a Wartsila 16V32 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 23 of 82
| Test Id: | 162 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 3.342 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing |
Result 24 of 82
| Test Id: | 17 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans |
| File Size: | 5.262 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 25 of 82
| Test Id: | 90 |
|---|---|
| Title: | David A. Tesone Enterprises
|
| File Size: | 8.680 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Jun-1987 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 26 of 82
| Test Id: | 91 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Deep South Trucking |
| File Size: | 4.212 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Jul-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: -5.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 310 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via CO testing 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 27 of 82
| Test Id: | 18 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Devall Diesel |
| File Size: | 5.236 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 |
| Test Date: | 5-Jun-2000 |
| Test Location: | Louisiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing -28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 28 of 82
| Test Id: | 92 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Distribution Trucking Company |
| File Size: | 9.884 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Jan-1994 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing -5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing 9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing 9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing 13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing 18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing 7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 29 of 82
| Test Id: | 211 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Echo Bay Mining |
| File Size: | 22.349 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 29-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Nevada, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 30 of 82
| Test Id: | 93 |
|---|---|
| Title: | EG&G Idaho |
| File Size: | 7.940 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |