FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 16 documents that match your query. These 16 documents contain a total of 311 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 11 of 16

Test Id: 157
Title: Peak Downs mine
File Size: 7.699 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1991
Test Date: 28-Aug-1990
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing
21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing
43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing
33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 12 of 16

Test Id: 136
Title: Rio Tinto UWA Thesis
File Size: 3.684 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Nov-2005
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
-6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
-9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing
9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing

Result 13 of 16

Test Id: 58
Title: San Juan Coal
File Size: 3.470 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jan-1985
Test Date: 1-Aug-1984
Test Location: New Mexico, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing
13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing
98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing

Result 14 of 16

Test Id: 47
Title: Smoky Canyon Mine
File Size: 7.162 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Wyoming, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing
0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing
9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing
7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 15 of 16

Test Id: 21
Title: Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp
File Size: 39.809 MB
Industries: Mining, Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 29-Apr-1992
Test Date: 21-Jun-1991
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing
0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing
-10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing

Result 16 of 16

Test Id: 9
Title: Utah Power and Light Scenic
File Size: 6.994 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date: 27-Jul-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing
15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing
5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing
6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing
15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing
-52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing
Show previous 10 documents