Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 165 documents that match your query. These 165 documents contain a total of 2,328 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 48 locations
- 7 different industries
- 5 different fuel types
- 52 different engine manufacturers
- 185 different engine types
- 12 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 112 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.486%
- 585 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.109%
- 29 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.291%
- 318 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.636%
- 19 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.776%
- 382 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.632%
- 396 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.706%
- 414 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.907%
- 12 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 37.442%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 9 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -6.067%
- 33 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 27.952%
Result 51 of 165
Test Id: | 63 |
---|---|
Title: | Esperance Port Authority |
File Size: | 0.138 MB |
Industries: | Generators |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2001 |
Test Date: | 5-Jul-2001 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 36.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 52 of 165
Test Id: | 152 |
---|---|
Title: | Farm Development Corporation |
File Size: | 1.237 MB |
Industries: | Boiler |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 24-Aug-1992 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 95.0% improvement on a Kewanee Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 53 of 165
Test Id: | 57 |
---|---|
Title: | Fimiston Open Pit |
File Size: | 0.117 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-1997 |
Test Date: | 28-Jun-1997 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -4.0% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Withdrawal testing |
Result 54 of 165
Test Id: | 188 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.069 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Sep-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on an engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on an engine via HC testing 16.0% improvement on an engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 55 of 165
Test Id: | 94 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC, Dry Valley Mine |
File Size: | 3.820 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Aug-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 56 of 165
Test Id: | 95 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC, Skull Point Field Trial |
File Size: | 28.206 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 26-Jun-1994 |
Test Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing |
Result 57 of 165
Test Id: | 20 |
---|---|
Title: | Freight Australia |
File Size: | 5.570 MB |
Industries: | Railroad |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-2000 |
Test Date: | 23-Jul-2000 |
Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 34.9% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 58 of 165
Test Id: | 7 |
---|---|
Title: | Freight Corp. |
File Size: | 6.225 MB |
Industries: | Railroad |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emission credit, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 |
Test Date: | 25-May-2000 |
Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 42.6% average improvement on 2 EMD 710G3A engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 59 of 165
Test Id: | 173 |
---|---|
Title: | Fuel Technology |
File Size: | 10.129 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Biocide, Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 60 of 165
Test Id: | 153 |
---|---|
Title: | Furnace Evaluation |
File Size: | 4.734 MB |
Industries: | Boiler |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
Report Date: | 29-Dec-1981 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |