Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 52 documents that match your query. These 52 documents contain a total of 526 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 14 locations
- 1 industry
- 3 different fuel types
- 14 different engine manufacturers
- 52 different engine types
- 11 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 63 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.700%
- 115 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.055%
- 11 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.279%
- 91 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.455%
- 2 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.865%
- 66 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 15.001%
- 59 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.681%
- 65 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.082%
- 23 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 26.000%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 12 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -5.642%
Result 41 of 52
| Test Id: | 136 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Rio Tinto UWA Thesis |
| File Size: | 3.684 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Nov-2005 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing -6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing 7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing 0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing -9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing 8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing 9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing |
Result 42 of 52
| Test Id: | 58 |
|---|---|
| Title: | San Juan Coal |
| File Size: | 3.470 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
| Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 43 of 52
| Test Id: | 47 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
| File Size: | 7.162 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 44 of 52
| Test Id: | 198 |
|---|---|
| Title: | South African Case study testimonial |
| File Size: | 0.111 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 7-Jul-2010 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 2 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 45 of 52
| Test Id: | 59 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Tarong Coal |
| File Size: | 0.078 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Feb-2002 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.2% average improvement on 4 MTU 12v 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 46 of 52
| Test Id: | 52 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Telfer Mine |
| File Size: | 0.063 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1998 |
| Test Date: | 16-Nov-1998 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 785B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 47 of 52
| Test Id: | 127 |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Plus Factor |
| File Size: | 2.690 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Generators, Mining, Railroad, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Publication |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2008 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 48 of 52
| Test Id: | 60 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Thiess Contractors |
| File Size: | 0.177 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-2001 |
| Test Date: | 15-Nov-2001 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 785C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 49 of 52
| Test Id: | 21 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp |
| File Size: | 39.809 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing |
Result 50 of 52
| Test Id: | 9 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light Scenic |
| File Size: | 6.994 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 27-Jul-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |