FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 57 documents that match your query. These 57 documents contain a total of 394 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 1 of 57

Test Id: 145
Title: Adams Industrial Sales
File Size: 4.998 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emission credit, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 14-Jun-1983
Test Date: 19-Apr-1983
Test Location: North Carolina, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.5% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 2 of 57

Test Id: 146
Title: AgipPetroli
File Size: 3.862 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Rome, Italy
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
14.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via CO testing
33.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via HC testing

Result 3 of 57

Test Id: 148
Title: AWP Contractors
File Size: 14.240 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1996
Test Date: 11-Jan-1996
Test Location: Alberta, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 777C engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
6.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 785B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 4 of 57

Test Id: 149
Title: Azienda Perugina Delia Mobilita
File Size: 4.773 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-Sep-1998
Test Date: 1-Aug-1997
Test Location: Perugia, Italy
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.0% improvement on a IVECO Bus engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 5 of 57

Test Id: 14
Title: Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station
File Size: 13.352 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1992
Test Date: 25-Oct-1992
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing
-45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
-10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing
7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing
38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 6 of 57

Test Id: 39
Title: Big Bell Mine
File Size: 0.051 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-1999
Test Date: 16-Aug-1999
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 7 of 57

Test Id: 144
Title: Boiler Efficiency
File Size: 8.345 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 9-Aug-1983
Test Date: 19-Apr-1983
Test Location: North Carolina, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 8 of 57

Test Id: 150
Title: Boiler Efficiency and Sludge Control
File Size: 17.635 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: 19-Apr-1983
Test Location: North Carolina, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 9 of 57

Test Id: 42
Title: Boral
File Size: 0.119 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1998
Test Date: 11-May-1998
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 10 of 57

Test Id: 130
Title: Canada ESDC (SFAT Development) Tests
File Size: 2.481 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1998
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Quebec, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
3.9% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via CO testing
1.7% average improvement on 3 SCRE 251 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 11 of 57

Test Id: 217
Title: Carosue Dam
File Size: 0.943 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-2011
Test Date: 6-Sep-2011
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.7% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 12 of 57

Test Id: 13
Title: Central Electricty Board Mauritius
File Size: 3.989 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Nov-1997
Test Date: 4-Aug-1997
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 4 Pielstick 18 PC3 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 13 of 57

Test Id: 140
Title: Central Electricty Board Mauritius 2
File Size: 8.617 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1999
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.2% average improvement on 6 Pielstick 18 PC3 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 14 of 57

Test Id: 41
Title: Central Norsman
File Size: 0.095 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2004
Test Date: 21-Apr-2004
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 15 of 57

Test Id: 6
Title: Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad
File Size: 13.241 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 16-Nov-1998
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.4% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 16 of 57

Test Id: 162
Title: Commercial Carrier Corporation
File Size: 3.342 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 26-Sep-1990
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing

Result 17 of 57

Test Id: 17
Title: Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans
File Size: 5.262 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 26-Nov-1987
Test Date: 1-Sep-1987
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing
5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing
45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing
5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing
17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing
11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing
-34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing
7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing

Result 18 of 57

Test Id: 44
Title: Dominion Mining
File Size: 12.589 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 27-May-1994
Test Date: 30-Mar-1994
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 19 of 57

Test Id: 131
Title: ESDC (RP-503, SFAT, AAR 3-Mode) Report for Go Transit
File Size: 0.149 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-Feb-2003
Test Date: 11-Feb-2003
Test Location: Quebec, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.5% average improvement on 3 EMD 710G3A engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
2.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via CO testing
5.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 20 of 57

Test Id: 221
Title: FerroMex
File Size: 1.810 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Jan-2012
Test Date: 20-Nov-2011
Test Location: Mexico, Mexico
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.5% improvement on a GE C-30 Super 7 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 21 of 57

Test Id: 57
Title: Fimiston Open Pit
File Size: 0.117 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-1997
Test Date: 28-Jun-1997
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.9% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped):
-4.0% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Withdrawal testing

Result 22 of 57

Test Id: 153
Title: Furnace Evaluation
File Size: 4.734 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 29-Dec-1981
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
100.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 23 of 57

Test Id: 190
Title: GO Transit Testimonial
File Size: 0.082 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Testimonial
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Mar-2006
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Ontario, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 24 of 57

Test Id: 34
Title: Goonyella
File Size: 0.131 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jan-2001
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 784B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
6.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 793B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 25 of 57

Test Id: 31
Title: Granny Smith
File Size: 8.783 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jul-1993
Test Date: 15-May-1993
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.8% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 26 of 57

Test Id: 55
Title: Granny Smith Mine
File Size: 0.091 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jun-1999
Test Date: 12-Apr-1999
Test Location: New South Wales, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 27 of 57

Test Id: 137
Title: Greyhound Lines, Florida
File Size: 6.244 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Jan-1986
Test Date: 1-Jan-1983
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.7% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
92.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO testing
9.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO2 testing
94.0% improvement on a Detroit V871 engine via HC testing

Result 28 of 57

Test Id: 129
Title: Guld Report
File Size: 2.135 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jul-1985
Test Date: 1-Mar-1985
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.3% average improvement on 45 Test Varimax engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 29 of 57

Test Id: 132
Title: India PCRA test
File Size: 0.080 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 26-Jun-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.3% improvement on a Tata 692 DI engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 30 of 57

Test Id: 178
Title: Indiana Harbor Belt RR
File Size: 3.366 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Testimonial
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 25-Feb-1998
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Indiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
7.7% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
7.7% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.0% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Smoke Spot testing
21.0% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Smoke Spot testing
21.0% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 31 of 57

Test Id: 32
Title: Kanowna-Belle
File Size: 8.479 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1997
Test Date: 3-Apr-1997
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777D engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 32 of 57

Test Id: 48
Title: KCGM Super Pit
File Size: 0.187 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2003
Test Date: 19-Jul-2003
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 33 of 57

Test Id: 105
Title: Lusk
File Size: 21.380 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 20-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing
11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
-46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing
20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing
56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 34 of 57

Test Id: 68
Title: M.S.Conus
File Size: 3.148 MB
Industries: Boiler, Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1985
Test Date: 1-Sep-1984
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing
3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing
35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing
1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing

Result 35 of 57

Test Id: 50
Title: MacMahon
File Size: 0.069 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1997
Test Date: 18-Mar-1997
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.4% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 630E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.8% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a Komatsu 785-3 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
29.0% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 630E engines via Smoke Spot testing
27.7% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 36 of 57

Test Id: 46
Title: Marandoo Mine
File Size: 0.223 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2003
Test Date: 13-May-2003
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.6% average improvement on 2 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
25.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 37 of 57

Test Id: 219
Title: MES Dyno tests
File Size: 0.535 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Apr-2012
Test Date: 20-Feb-2012
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar C11 DI TA AAAC 353hp engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 38 of 57

Test Id: 218
Title: Mina La Herradura
File Size: 1.354 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 22-Nov-2011
Test Date: 22-Nov-2011
Test Location: Mexico, Mexico
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 789C engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 39 of 57

Test Id: 67
Title: MT Nivosa
File Size: 0.054 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 11-Nov-1986
Test Date: 1-Apr-1986
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.1% improvement on a Sulzer 6 RTA 76 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 40 of 57

Test Id: 35
Title: Mt. Keith Mine
File Size: 0.235 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-2005
Test Date: 26-Jul-2005
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 793C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
26.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 41 of 57

Test Id: 36
Title: Mt. Whaleback Mine
File Size: 0.147 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Feb-2002
Test Date: 18-Dec-2001
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 789 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 42 of 57

Test Id: 66
Title: Neptune Marine
File Size: 1.232 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 1-May-1988
Test Date: 6-Apr-1985
Test Location: Singapore, China
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.0% improvement on a Pielstick 8PC4-2L-570 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 43 of 57

Test Id: 64
Title: North Flinders
File Size: 0.165 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1989
Test Date: 6-May-1989
Test Location: Southern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing
3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing
54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing
33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 44 of 57

Test Id: 156
Title: Oil-Diesel Mixture
File Size: 3.613 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 22-Jul-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
22.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 45 of 57

Test Id: 54
Title: Osborne Mines
File Size: 27.664 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jul-2000
Test Date: 7-Jun-2000
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.3% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 12V32E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 46 of 57

Test Id: 158
Title: Perilya Mines Fortnum Gold Mine
File Size: 12.006 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1996
Test Date: 21-Nov-1996
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 47 of 57

Test Id: 133
Title: Perugia Italy
File Size: 0.029 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Perugia, Italy
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.6% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.3% average improvement on 3 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.8% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO testing
0.2% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO2 testing

Result 48 of 57

Test Id: 143
Title: Rempel Bros
File Size: 0.026 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 17-Nov-2009
Test Date: 3-Nov-2009
Test Location: Vancouver, Canada
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.5% average improvement on 13 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 49 of 57

Test Id: 122
Title: Residential Boiler
File Size: 0.027 MB
Industries: Boiler
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 1D Diesel (Kerosene)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.0% average improvement on 2 Amer.Furnace M 175-C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
12.4% improvement on a Carrier 38M-105K401 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
3.1% improvement on a Crane MP-1192 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
1.6% improvement on a Hallmark engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 50 of 57

Test Id: 136
Title: Rio Tinto UWA Thesis
File Size: 3.684 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Nov-2005
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
-6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
-9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing
9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing

Result 51 of 57

Test Id: 222
Title: Royal Caribbean
File Size: 4.725 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 14-May-2012
Test Date: 8-Apr-2012
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing
4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing
20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing
38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 52 of 57

Test Id: 171
Title: Southwest Research RP-503
File Size: 0.353 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jul-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.7% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
6.5% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via CO testing
4.6% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via HC testing
-3.8% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via NOx testing
Notes: This test was conducted on a clean, new EMD 12-645E3B.

Result 53 of 57

Test Id: 59
Title: Tarong Coal
File Size: 0.078 MB
Industries: Mining, Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Feb-2002
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.2% average improvement on 4 MTU 12v 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 54 of 57

Test Id: 52
Title: Telfer Mine
File Size: 0.063 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1998
Test Date: 16-Nov-1998
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 785B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 55 of 57

Test Id: 60
Title: Thiess Contractors
File Size: 0.177 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-2001
Test Date: 15-Nov-2001
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 785C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 56 of 57

Test Id: 77
Title: Western Fuel Association
File Size: 36.135 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 15-Dec-1997
Test Date: 1-Aug-1997
Test Location: Colorado, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 57 of 57

Test Id: 4
Title: Wisconsin Central 2
File Size: 6.093 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Oct-1996
Test Date: 29-May-1996
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.0% average improvement on 4 EMD 645E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.6% improvement on a EMD SD45 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing