Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 64 documents that match your query. These 64 documents contain a total of 946 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 23 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 21 different engine manufacturers
- 68 different engine types
- 8 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 30 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.614%
- 268 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.348%
- 23 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.157%
- 79 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.124%
- 1 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of -2.000%
- 169 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.296%
- 167 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 1.855%
- 209 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.086%
Result 41 of 64
Test Id: | 170 |
---|---|
Title: | Armco Steel Testimonial |
File Size: | 1.054 MB |
Industries: | Buses, Railroad, Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
Fuels: | |
Report Date: | 24-Oct-1994 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 42 of 64
Test Id: | 174 |
---|---|
Title: | Basil Read |
File Size: | 0.721 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Dec-1995 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Natal, India |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 15.4% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 43 of 64
Test Id: | 79 |
---|---|
Title: | BEC-allwaste |
File Size: | 22.693 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 15-Sep-1996 |
Test Date: | 10-Jul-1996 |
Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing 0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing -3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing 17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing -1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing 14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing 11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing 10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing 14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing 42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing 29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing 19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing 29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing 36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 44 of 64
Test Id: | 80 |
---|---|
Title: | BFI Holding |
File Size: | 16.594 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 45 of 64
Test Id: | 27 |
---|---|
Title: | Boise Cascade Corporation |
File Size: | 12.213 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
Test Date: | 3-Aug-1993 |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing |
Result 46 of 64
Test Id: | 82 |
---|---|
Title: | Brambles Trucking |
File Size: | 0.488 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 13-Feb-1992 |
Test Date: | 14-Nov-1991 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing 23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing 20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 47 of 64
Test Id: | 84 |
---|---|
Title: | Charley Brothers |
File Size: | 14.550 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jul-1989 |
Test Date: | 13-Apr-1989 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.8% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.6% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -69.5% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via HC testing -85.7% improvement on a Navistar 444 engine via HC testing |
Result 48 of 64
Test Id: | 141 |
---|---|
Title: | Chizek Trucking |
File Size: | 0.183 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-2003 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.3% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 49 of 64
Test Id: | 86 |
---|---|
Title: | City of Boise |
File Size: | 5.064 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.4% improvement on a Cummins 270 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Cummins 330 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Mack 300 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.3% improvement on a Cummins 330 engine via HC testing |
Result 50 of 64
Test Id: | 88 |
---|---|
Title: | City of Southaven |
File Size: | 0.774 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 28-Dec-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Mississippi, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.7% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -45.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO testing 92.7% average improvement on 2 Isuzu Pickup engines via CO testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO2 testing 7.1% improvement on a Ford Ambulance engine via CO2 testing -1.1% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via CO2 testing -21.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 60.1% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via HC testing 58.9% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via HC testing |
Result 51 of 64
Test Id: | 89 |
---|---|
Title: | Coca-Cola Bottling |
File Size: | 18.379 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 11-Oct-1994 |
Test Date: | 11-Jul-1994 |
Test Location: | Texas, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing 0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing 17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 52 of 64
Test Id: | 162 |
---|---|
Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation ![]() |
File Size: | 3.342 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing |
Result 53 of 64
Test Id: | 200 |
---|---|
Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation Testimonials |
File Size: | 1.697 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 54 of 64
Test Id: | 90 |
---|---|
Title: | David A. Tesone Enterprises ![]() |
File Size: | 8.680 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 13-Jun-1987 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 55 of 64
Test Id: | 175 |
---|---|
Title: | David Tesone Trucking |
File Size: | 0.623 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 56 of 64
Test Id: | 91 |
---|---|
Title: | Deep South Trucking |
File Size: | 4.212 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 22-Jul-1992 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: -5.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 310 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via CO testing 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 57 of 64
Test Id: | 92 |
---|---|
Title: | Distribution Trucking Company |
File Size: | 9.884 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Jan-1994 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing -5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing 9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing 9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing 13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing 18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing 7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 58 of 64
Test Id: | 93 |
---|---|
Title: | EG&G Idaho |
File Size: | 7.940 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Aug-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 59 of 64
Test Id: | 201 |
---|---|
Title: | FPC letter Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.007 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 15-Mar-2007 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 60 of 64
Test Id: | 189 |
---|---|
Title: | Fraley-Schilling |
File Size: | 0.646 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 5-Apr-2007 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Ohio, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 2 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 61 of 64
Test Id: | 120 |
---|---|
Title: | Gainsville |
File Size: | 0.028 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 20-Aug-1990 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing 6.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing 41.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing |
Result 62 of 64
Test Id: | 96 |
---|---|
Title: | Golden Gem Growers |
File Size: | 9.576 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Feb-1991 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via CO2 testing 42.5% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via HC testing |
Result 63 of 64
Test Id: | 177 |
---|---|
Title: | Imperial |
File Size: | 0.502 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 8-Nov-1995 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | South Africa, Africa |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 64 of 64
Test Id: | 164 |
---|---|
Title: | Industrial Waste Services ![]() |
File Size: | 3.543 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 20-Jul-1990 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 19.0% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 19.0% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 7.6% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO2 testing 29.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 29.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via HC testing |
Result 65 of 64
Test Id: | 24 |
---|---|
Title: | Interlink Express |
File Size: | 9.470 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 14-Dec-1995 |
Test Date: | 19-Jul-1995 |
Test Location: | England, England |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 66 of 64
Test Id: | 101 |
---|---|
Title: | JBP Companies |
File Size: | 0.424 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 22-Apr-1992 |
Test Date: | 20-Jan-1992 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 67 of 64
Test Id: | 102 |
---|---|
Title: | Kenworth Tractors |
File Size: | 0.036 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 30-Aug-1993 |
Test Date: | 1-Jun-1992 |
Test Location: | Washington, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 17 Caterpillar 3406TA engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing |
Result 68 of 64
Test Id: | 103 |
---|---|
Title: | Knoxville Transportation |
File Size: | 7.635 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 20-Jun-1985 |
Test Date: | 12-Nov-1984 |
Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.9% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing |
Result 69 of 64
Test Id: | 105 |
---|---|
Title: | Lusk |
File Size: | 21.380 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
Test Date: | 20-Apr-1994 |
Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing 20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing 56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 70 of 64
Test Id: | 107 |
---|---|
Title: | Memphis Cablevision |
File Size: | 0.655 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 27-Dec-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 11.8% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 17.4% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via CO2 testing 12.4% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via HC testing 29.6% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via HC testing |
Result 71 of 64
Test Id: | 128 |
---|---|
Title: | Motor Magazine |
File Size: | 0.295 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | |
Report Date: | 1-May-2008 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 72 of 64
Test Id: | 108 |
---|---|
Title: | Neff Trucking |
File Size: | 12.954 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 7-Jun-1987 |
Test Date: | 1-Jul-1987 |
Test Location: | Ohio, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.0% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 10.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 73 of 64
Test Id: | 180 |
---|---|
Title: | Neff Trucking Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.699 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 30-Jun-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Ohio, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% improvement on a Mack 300 engine via Statistical testing |
Result 74 of 64
Test Id: | 109 |
---|---|
Title: | Ore-Ida Phase 2 |
File Size: | 0.977 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 30-Sep-1993 |
Test Date: | 26-Nov-1992 |
Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.6% average improvement on 17 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing |
Result 75 of 64
Test Id: | 191 |
---|---|
Title: | Pacific Power Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.082 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 15-Jan-1991 |
Test Date: | 26-Jan-1990 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 76 of 64
Test Id: | 165 |
---|---|
Title: | Pepsi Orlando ![]() |
File Size: | 2.732 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Oct-1990 |
Test Date: | 12-Sep-1990 |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 19.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 77 of 64
Test Id: | 110 |
---|---|
Title: | Pierce Trucking |
File Size: | 5.133 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 9-Nov-1987 |
Test Date: | 1-Oct-1987 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via CO2 testing 15.1% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 78 of 64
Test Id: | 26 |
---|---|
Title: | Provo City |
File Size: | 51.613 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 12-Sep-1995 |
Test Date: | 12-Jun-1995 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing -19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing 22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing 3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing 32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing 5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing 33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing 21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 79 of 64
Test Id: | 182 |
---|---|
Title: | Provo Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.802 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 13-Nov-1997 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 80 of 64
Test Id: | 143 |
---|---|
Title: | Rempel Bros |
File Size: | 0.026 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 17-Nov-2009 |
Test Date: | 3-Nov-2009 |
Test Location: | Vancouver, Canada |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% average improvement on 13 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 81 of 64
Test Id: | 196 |
---|---|
Title: | Sadler |
File Size: | 0.177 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 82 of 64
Test Id: | 197 |
---|---|
Title: | Schultz Express |
File Size: | 0.019 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 17-Apr-2006 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Iowa, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 11.9% average improvement on 2 engines via Statistical testing |
Result 83 of 64
Test Id: | 111 |
---|---|
Title: | Stein Distributing |
File Size: | 0.031 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 14-Sep-1992 |
Test Date: | 1-Aug-1992 |
Test Location: | Washington, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.1% average improvement on 3 Ford 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing |
Result 84 of 64
Test Id: | 183 |
---|---|
Title: | Stein Distributing Company |
File Size: | 0.603 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 24-Nov-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 85 of 64
Test Id: | 135 |
---|---|
Title: | System Controls |
File Size: | 4.432 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | Gasoline |
Report Date: | 28-May-1982 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | California, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet V8 engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.1% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via CO testing 1.3% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via HC testing -2.0% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via NOx testing |
Result 86 of 64
Test Id: | 112 |
---|---|
Title: | T.G. Lee Foods, Inc |
File Size: | 13.442 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 30-Oct-1995 |
Test Date: | 25-Oct-1995 |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing 16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing 8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 87 of 64
Test Id: | 59 |
---|---|
Title: | Tarong Coal |
File Size: | 0.078 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Feb-2002 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.2% average improvement on 4 MTU 12v 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 88 of 64
Test Id: | 126 |
---|---|
Title: | The Daily Herald |
File Size: | 5.762 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Nov-1995 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 89 of 64
Test Id: | 127 |
---|---|
Title: | The Plus Factor |
File Size: | 2.690 MB |
Industries: | Boiler, Generators, Mining, Railroad, Trucking |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2008 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 90 of 64
Test Id: | 2 |
---|---|
Title: | Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco) ![]() |
File Size: | 7.716 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Sep-1988 |
Test Date: | 7-Jul-1988 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing 8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing 31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing |
Result 91 of 64
Test Id: | 113 |
---|---|
Title: | Three Rivers Ice Cream |
File Size: | 6.057 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 20-Aug-1988 |
Test Date: | 25-May-1988 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.8% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO testing 13.2% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing 22.6% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via HC testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via HC testing |
Result 92 of 64
Test Id: | 199 |
---|---|
Title: | Three Rivers Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.035 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 93 of 64
Test Id: | 184 |
---|---|
Title: | Traco Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.648 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 94 of 64
Test Id: | 30 |
---|---|
Title: | Triangle Gas Company |
File Size: | 26.224 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 28-May-1987 |
Test Date: | 17-Apr-1987 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via CO2 testing |
Result 95 of 64
Test Id: | 185 |
---|---|
Title: | Triangle Gas Company Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.589 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 11-Aug-1987 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 96 of 64
Test Id: | 134 |
---|---|
Title: | Tshwane University of Technology |
File Size: | 0.104 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
Benefits: | |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | South Africa, Africa |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 97 of 64
Test Id: | 114 |
---|---|
Title: | United Telephone |
File Size: | 12.168 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Oct-1988 |
Test Date: | 10-Aug-1988 |
Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 1.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 8.2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing |
Result 98 of 64
Test Id: | 21 |
---|---|
Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp |
File Size: | 39.809 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 |
Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing |
Result 99 of 64
Test Id: | 168 |
---|---|
Title: | V.E. Whitehurst & Sons ![]() |
File Size: | 1.646 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 6-Jun-1991 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.2% improvement on a Int'l 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 250 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.5% improvement on a Int'l 7.3 engine via HC testing 15.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 250 engines via HC testing 15.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing |
Result 100 of 64
Test Id: | 115 |
---|---|
Title: | Vogel Disposal |
File Size: | 10.107 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 9-Dec-1987 |
Test Date: | 28-Nov-1987 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing |
Result 101 of 64
Test Id: | 117 |
---|---|
Title: | Wal-Mart |
File Size: | 34.933 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 6-Mar-1995 |
Test Date: | 1-Mar-1995 |
Test Location: | Arkansas, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -42.2% average improvement on 3 Detroit S-60 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via CO2 testing -2.4% average improvement on 4 Detroit S-60 engines via HC testing |
Result 102 of 64
Test Id: | 116 |
---|---|
Title: | Walbon Transit |
File Size: | 0.033 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Oct-1995 |
Test Date: | 1-Sep-1995 |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 235 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on a Mack 235 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 103 of 64
Test Id: | 118 |
---|---|
Title: | Waste Management of Dallas |
File Size: | 36.117 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 28-Jun-1995 |
Test Date: | 25-Apr-1995 |
Test Location: | Texas, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.0% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 11.5% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 3.2% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 0.8% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 104 of 64
Test Id: | 119 |
---|---|
Title: | Wayne W. Sell Corporation |
File Size: | 10.465 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Dec-1987 |
Test Date: | 19-Nov-1987 |
Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO2 testing |
Show previous 10 documents |