FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 57 documents that match your query. These 57 documents contain a total of 394 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 31 of 57

Test Id: 32
Title: Kanowna-Belle
File Size: 8.479 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1997
Test Date: 3-Apr-1997
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777D engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 32 of 57

Test Id: 48
Title: KCGM Super Pit
File Size: 0.187 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2003
Test Date: 19-Jul-2003
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 33 of 57

Test Id: 105
Title: Lusk
File Size: 21.380 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 20-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing
11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
-46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing
20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing
56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 34 of 57

Test Id: 68
Title: M.S.Conus
File Size: 3.148 MB
Industries: Boiler, Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1985
Test Date: 1-Sep-1984
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing
3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing
35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing
1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing

Result 35 of 57

Test Id: 50
Title: MacMahon
File Size: 0.069 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-1997
Test Date: 18-Mar-1997
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.4% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 630E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.8% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a Komatsu 785-3 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
29.0% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 630E engines via Smoke Spot testing
27.7% average improvement on 3 Komatsu 785-3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 36 of 57

Test Id: 46
Title: Marandoo Mine
File Size: 0.223 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2003
Test Date: 13-May-2003
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.6% average improvement on 2 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
25.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 37 of 57

Test Id: 219
Title: MES Dyno tests
File Size: 0.535 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Apr-2012
Test Date: 20-Feb-2012
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar C11 DI TA AAAC 353hp engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 38 of 57

Test Id: 218
Title: Mina La Herradura
File Size: 1.354 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 22-Nov-2011
Test Date: 22-Nov-2011
Test Location: Mexico, Mexico
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 789C engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 39 of 57

Test Id: 67
Title: MT Nivosa
File Size: 0.054 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 11-Nov-1986
Test Date: 1-Apr-1986
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.1% improvement on a Sulzer 6 RTA 76 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing

Result 40 of 57

Test Id: 35
Title: Mt. Keith Mine
File Size: 0.235 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-2005
Test Date: 26-Jul-2005
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 793C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
26.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Smoke Spot testing
Show previous 10 documents Show all documents on one page Show next 10 documents