Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There is 1 document that matches your query. This 1 document contains a total of 18 individual tests. The document is listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 1 location
- 1 industry
- 1 type of fuel
- 2 different engine manufacturers
- 5 different engine types
- 4 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 5 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.648%
- 5 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 16.238%
- 3 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 29.673%
- 5 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.228%
Result 1 of 1
| Test Id: | 95 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC, Skull Point Field Trial |
| File Size: | 28.206 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Jun-1994 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing |