Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There is 1 document that matches your query. This 1 document contains a total of 35 individual tests. The document is listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 1 location
- 1 industry
- 1 type of fuel
- 4 different engine manufacturers
- 5 different engine types
- 5 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 7 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.894%
- 7 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 45.429%
- 7 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.243%
- 7 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.849%
- 7 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.034%
Result 1 of 1
| Test Id: | 104 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Laidlaw Bus |
| File Size: | 13.087 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-May-1996 |
| Test Date: | 27-Mar-1996 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing 23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing 6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing 30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing -0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing 18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing 45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing |