Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 83 documents that match your query. These 83 documents contain a total of 1,792 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 32 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 36 different engine manufacturers
- 111 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 57 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.487%
- 387 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.636%
- 17 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.221%
- 215 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.616%
- 16 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.484%
- 392 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.728%
- 361 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.360%
- 346 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.703%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 61 of 83
| Test Id: | 222 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Royal Caribbean |
| File Size: | 4.725 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 14-May-2012 |
| Test Date: | 8-Apr-2012 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 62 of 83
| Test Id: | 58 |
|---|---|
| Title: | San Juan Coal |
| File Size: | 3.470 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
| Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 63 of 83
| Test Id: | 47 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
| File Size: | 7.162 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 64 of 83
| Test Id: | 204 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Southwest Research EPA Emissions 
|
| File Size: | 2.017 MB |
| Industries: | |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions |
| Fuels: | Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1997 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 18.8% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via HC testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via NOx testing |
Result 65 of 83
| Test Id: | 171 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Southwest Research RP-503
|
| File Size: | 0.353 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Jul-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.7% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.5% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via CO testing 4.6% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via HC testing -3.8% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via NOx testing |
| Notes: | This test was conducted on a clean, new EMD 12-645E3B. |
Result 66 of 83
| Test Id: | 135 |
|---|---|
| Title: | System Controls |
| File Size: | 4.432 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 28-May-1982 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | California, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet V8 engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.1% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via CO testing 1.3% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via HC testing -2.0% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via NOx testing |
Result 67 of 83
| Test Id: | 112 |
|---|---|
| Title: | T.G. Lee Foods, Inc |
| File Size: | 13.442 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Oct-1995 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1995 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing 16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing 8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 68 of 83
| Test Id: | 166 |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Metropolitan Transit Authority
|
| File Size: | 5.507 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 23-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing 45.2% average improvement on 9 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 69 of 83
| Test Id: | 167 |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Tennessee Department of Transportation
|
| File Size: | 5.206 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 19.7% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 20.6% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.3% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 30.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 32.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3208 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Cummins 855 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Ford 671 engine via HC testing 32.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing |
Result 70 of 83
| Test Id: | 2 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco)
|
| File Size: | 7.716 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Sep-1988 |
| Test Date: | 7-Jul-1988 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing 8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing 31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |