Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 83 documents that match your query. These 83 documents contain a total of 1,792 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 32 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 36 different engine manufacturers
- 111 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 57 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.487%
- 387 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.636%
- 17 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.221%
- 215 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.616%
- 16 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.484%
- 392 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.728%
- 361 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.360%
- 346 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.703%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 41 of 83
Test Id: | 73 |
---|---|
Title: | Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad |
File Size: | 15.412 MB |
Industries: | Railroad |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 15-Sep-1997 |
Test Date: | 4-Aug-1997 |
Test Location: | Indiana, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.6% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO testing 59.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO testing -18.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO testing 9.7% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO2 testing 6.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO2 testing 6.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 34.5% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via HC testing 53.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via HC testing 50.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing |
Result 42 of 83
Test Id: | 164 |
---|---|
Title: | Industrial Waste Services |
File Size: | 3.543 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 20-Jul-1990 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Florida, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 19.0% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 19.0% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing 7.6% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO2 testing 29.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 29.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via HC testing |
Result 43 of 83
Test Id: | 24 |
---|---|
Title: | Interlink Express |
File Size: | 9.470 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 14-Dec-1995 |
Test Date: | 19-Jul-1995 |
Test Location: | England, England |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 44 of 83
Test Id: | 100 |
---|---|
Title: | J.R.C. Enterprises |
File Size: | 7.130 MB |
Industries: | Buses |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-1983 |
Test Date: | 1-Jul-1983 |
Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7011 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO testing 9.3% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO2 testing 41.2% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via HC testing |
Result 45 of 83
Test Id: | 101 |
---|---|
Title: | JBP Companies |
File Size: | 0.424 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 22-Apr-1992 |
Test Date: | 20-Jan-1992 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 46 of 83
Test Id: | 142 |
---|---|
Title: | Jelco Buses |
File Size: | 10.387 MB |
Industries: | Buses |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 28-Mar-1988 |
Test Date: | 21-Jan-1988 |
Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing -19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing |
Result 47 of 83
Test Id: | 49 |
---|---|
Title: | Kennecott Copper |
File Size: | 26.441 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Apr-1995 |
Test Date: | 27-Feb-1995 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 48 of 83
Test Id: | 104 |
---|---|
Title: | Laidlaw Bus |
File Size: | 13.087 MB |
Industries: | Buses |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 23-May-1996 |
Test Date: | 27-Mar-1996 |
Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing 23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing 15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing 6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing 30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing -0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing 18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing 7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing 45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 49 of 83
Test Id: | 105 |
---|---|
Title: | Lusk |
File Size: | 21.380 MB |
Industries: | Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
Test Date: | 20-Apr-1994 |
Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing 20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing 37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing 56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 50 of 83
Test Id: | 68 |
---|---|
Title: | M.S.Conus |
File Size: | 3.148 MB |
Industries: | Boiler, Marine |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 |
Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 |
Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing |
Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |