Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 27 documents that match your query. These 27 documents contain a total of 450 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 11 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 9 different engine manufacturers
- 32 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 16 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.919%
- 115 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.055%
- 5 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.500%
- 89 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.364%
- 61 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 15.604%
- 55 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.541%
- 62 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.289%
- 23 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 26.000%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 5 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -7.700%
Result 21 of 27
Test Id: | 157 |
---|---|
Title: | Peak Downs mine |
File Size: | 7.699 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-1991 |
Test Date: | 28-Aug-1990 |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing 43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing 33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 22 of 27
Test Id: | 58 |
---|---|
Title: | San Juan Coal |
File Size: | 3.470 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jan-1985 |
Test Date: | 1-Aug-1984 |
Test Location: | New Mexico, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing 98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing |
Result 23 of 27
Test Id: | 47 |
---|---|
Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine |
File Size: | 7.162 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 24 of 27
Test Id: | 21 |
---|---|
Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp |
File Size: | 39.809 MB |
Industries: | Mining, Trucking |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 |
Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing |
Result 25 of 27
Test Id: | 9 |
---|---|
Title: | Utah Power and Light Scenic |
File Size: | 6.994 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
Report Date: | 27-Jul-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing 5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing 15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing -52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing |
Result 26 of 27
Test Id: | 38 |
---|---|
Title: | Wesfarmers Coal |
File Size: | 0.176 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2001 |
Test Date: | 3-Jul-2001 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Komatsu 149 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.3% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 149 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 27 of 27
Test Id: | 62 |
---|---|
Title: | Worsley Alumina |
File Size: | 0.101 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Mar-2004 |
Test Date: | 23-Jul-2003 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 985 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.2% average improvement on 5 Komatsu 985 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Show previous 10 documents |