Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 190 documents that match your query. These 190 documents contain a total of 2,488 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 48 locations
- 7 different industries
- 5 different fuel types
- 52 different engine manufacturers
- 185 different engine types
- 12 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 205 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.040%
- 642 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.132%
- 48 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.875%
- 309 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.902%
- 14 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.561%
- 387 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.561%
- 404 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.582%
- 424 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.875%
- 23 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 26.000%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 12 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -5.642%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 91 of 190
| Test Id: | 24 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Interlink Express |
| File Size: | 9.470 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 14-Dec-1995 |
| Test Date: | 19-Jul-1995 |
| Test Location: | England, England |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 92 of 190
| Test Id: | 100 |
|---|---|
| Title: | J.R.C. Enterprises |
| File Size: | 7.130 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1983 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jul-1983 |
| Test Location: | Arizona, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7011 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO testing 9.3% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO2 testing 41.2% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via HC testing |
Result 93 of 190
| Test Id: | 101 |
|---|---|
| Title: | JBP Companies |
| File Size: | 0.424 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Apr-1992 |
| Test Date: | 20-Jan-1992 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing -2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing 0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing |
Result 94 of 190
| Test Id: | 142 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Jelco Buses |
| File Size: | 10.387 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Mar-1988 |
| Test Date: | 21-Jan-1988 |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing -19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing |
Result 95 of 190
| Test Id: | 32 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Kanowna-Belle |
| File Size: | 8.479 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-1997 |
| Test Date: | 3-Apr-1997 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 777D engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 96 of 190
| Test Id: | 48 |
|---|---|
| Title: | KCGM Super Pit |
| File Size: | 0.187 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2003 |
| Test Date: | 19-Jul-2003 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 97 of 190
| Test Id: | 49 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Kennecott Copper |
| File Size: | 26.441 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Apr-1995 |
| Test Date: | 27-Feb-1995 |
| Test Location: | Utah, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 98 of 190
| Test Id: | 102 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Kenworth Tractors |
| File Size: | 0.036 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jun-1992 |
| Test Location: | Washington, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 17 Caterpillar 3406TA engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing |
Result 99 of 190
| Test Id: | 103 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Knoxville Transportation |
| File Size: | 7.635 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 20-Jun-1985 |
| Test Date: | 12-Nov-1984 |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.9% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing |
Result 100 of 190
| Test Id: | 74 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Kyle Railroad 
|
| File Size: | 22.532 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 6-Dec-1995 |
| Test Date: | 1-Jun-1995 |
| Test Location: | Kansas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 9 GE U30C-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.1% average improvement on 17 GE U30C-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |