Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 78 documents that match your query. These 78 documents contain a total of 780 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 48 locations
- 7 different industries
- 5 different fuel types
- 52 different engine manufacturers
- 185 different engine types
- 12 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 61 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.498%
- 188 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.451%
- 14 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.980%
- 144 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.475%
- 4 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.583%
- 97 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.676%
- 93 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of -0.135%
- 114 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.326%
- 37 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 31.189%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 9 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -6.067%
Result 11 of 78
| Test Id: | 145 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Adams Industrial Sales | 
| File Size: | 4.998 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emission credit, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 14-Jun-1983 | 
| Test Date: | 19-Apr-1983 | 
| Test Location: | North Carolina, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.5% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 12 of 78
| Test Id: | 69 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Alaska Railroad Corporation   | 
| File Size: | 72.735 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 10-Nov-1995 | 
| Test Date: | 16-Sep-1995 | 
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing -13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 13 of 78
| Test Id: | 203 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Amatola Bus Fleet Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.538 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 17-Jan-1996 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | England, England | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.8% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing | 
Result 14 of 78
| Test Id: | 70 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel | 
| File Size: | 16.072 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 30-Jul-1985 | 
| Test Date: | 20-Feb-1985 | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing | 
Result 15 of 78
| Test Id: | 170 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 1.054 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses, Railroad, Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 24-Oct-1994 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 16 of 78
| Test Id: | 71 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Australia Railroad Group (ARG) | 
| File Size: | 4.805 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2006 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Jun-2006 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 4 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing | 
Result 17 of 78
| Test Id: | 149 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Azienda Perugina Delia Mobilita | 
| File Size: | 4.773 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 28-Sep-1998 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1997 | 
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% improvement on a IVECO Bus engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 18 of 78
| Test Id: | 193 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Azienda Perugina della Mobilita Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.015 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 28-Sep-1998 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.7% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing | 
Result 19 of 78
| Test Id: | 80 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding | 
| File Size: | 16.594 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 | 
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 | 
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 20 of 78
| Test Id: | 39 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Big Bell Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.051 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1999 | 
| Test Date: | 16-Aug-1999 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 21 of 78
| Test Id: | 40 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Blue Circle Cement | 
| File Size: | 0.067 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1997 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Mar-1997 | 
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Smoke Spot testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -7.7% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Withdrawal testing | 
Result 22 of 78
| Test Id: | 144 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Boiler Efficiency | 
| File Size: | 8.345 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 9-Aug-1983 | 
| Test Date: | 19-Apr-1983 | 
| Test Location: | North Carolina, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 23 of 78
| Test Id: | 150 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Boiler Efficiency and Sludge Control | 
| File Size: | 17.635 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Date: | 19-Apr-1983 | 
| Test Location: | North Carolina, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 24 of 78
| Test Id: | 83 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Broward County Schools | 
| File Size: | 14.875 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 4-Apr-1995 | 
| Test Date: | 28-Oct-1994 | 
| Test Location: | Florida, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins B engines via CO testing 21.2% average improvement on 3 Navistar 444 engines via CO testing 19.6% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO testing -9.4% average improvement on 2 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO testing 5.4% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via CO2 testing 1.9% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via CO2 testing 3.8% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO2 testing 4.2% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO2 testing -18.2% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via HC testing 7.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via HC testing 15.5% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via HC testing -36.5% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via HC testing 13.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.3% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 25 of 78
| Test Id: | 187 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway | 
| File Size: | 26.822 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-May-2000 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing 43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing 11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 26 of 78
| Test Id: | 13 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Electricty Board Mauritius | 
| File Size: | 3.989 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1997 | 
| Test Date: | 4-Aug-1997 | 
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 4 Pielstick 18 PC3 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 27 of 78
| Test Id: | 41 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Norsman | 
| File Size: | 0.095 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-May-2004 | 
| Test Date: | 21-Apr-2004 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 28 of 78
| Test Id: | 17 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans | 
| File Size: | 5.262 MB | 
| Industries: | Marine | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing | 
Result 29 of 78
| Test Id: | 43 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Darlot Gold Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.031 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-2006 | 
| Test Date: | 26-Jul-2006 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 30 of 78
| Test Id: | 90 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | David A. Tesone Enterprises   | 
| File Size: | 8.680 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 13-Jun-1987 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing | 
Result 31 of 78
| Test Id: | 175 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | David Tesone Trucking | 
| File Size: | 0.623 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 32 of 78
| Test Id: | 18 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Devall Diesel | 
| File Size: | 5.236 MB | 
| Industries: | Marine | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 | 
| Test Date: | 5-Jun-2000 | 
| Test Location: | Louisiana, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing -28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 33 of 78
| Test Id: | 44 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Dominion Mining | 
| File Size: | 12.589 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 27-May-1994 | 
| Test Date: | 30-Mar-1994 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 34 of 78
| Test Id: | 123 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Earth Moving | 
| File Size: | 6.384 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1990 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 35 of 78
| Test Id: | 63 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Esperance Port Authority | 
| File Size: | 0.138 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2001 | 
| Test Date: | 5-Jul-2001 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 36.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 36 of 78
| Test Id: | 152 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Farm Development Corporation | 
| File Size: | 1.237 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 24-Aug-1992 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA | 
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 95.0% improvement on a Kewanee Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 37 of 78
| Test Id: | 57 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Fimiston Open Pit | 
| File Size: | 0.117 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1997 | 
| Test Date: | 28-Jun-1997 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -4.0% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Withdrawal testing | 
Result 38 of 78
| Test Id: | 45 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC Mining | 
| File Size: | 12.303 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 16-Dec-1994 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Jun-1993 | 
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 31.8% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Wear Metals testing 34.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Wear Metals testing 12.2% improvement on a Caterpillar D10N engine via Wear Metals testing -13.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins TD25G engines via Wear Metals testing 13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Wear Metals testing | 
Result 39 of 78
| Test Id: | 20 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Freight Australia | 
| File Size: | 5.570 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-2000 | 
| Test Date: | 23-Jul-2000 | 
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 34.9% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 40 of 78
| Test Id: | 7 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Freight Corp. | 
| File Size: | 6.225 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emission credit, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 | 
| Test Date: | 25-May-2000 | 
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 42.6% average improvement on 2 EMD 710G3A engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 41 of 78
| Test Id: | 173 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Fuel Technology | 
| File Size: | 10.129 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-May-1989 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 42 of 78
| Test Id: | 153 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Furnace Evaluation | 
| File Size: | 4.734 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 29-Dec-1981 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 43 of 78
| Test Id: | 72 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Geneva Steel | 
| File Size: | 7.723 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 22-Feb-1999 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1997 | 
| Test Location: | Utah, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing -8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing 11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 44 of 78
| Test Id: | 190 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | GO Transit Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.082 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 21-Mar-2006 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Ontario, Canada | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 45 of 78
| Test Id: | 55 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Granny Smith Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.091 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1999 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1999 | 
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 46 of 78
| Test Id: | 177 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Imperial | 
| File Size: | 0.502 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 8-Nov-1995 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | South Africa, Africa | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 47 of 78
| Test Id: | 142 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Jelco Buses | 
| File Size: | 10.387 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 28-Mar-1988 | 
| Test Date: | 21-Jan-1988 | 
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing 6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing -19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing | 
Result 48 of 78
| Test Id: | 155 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | K.D. Perdana | 
| File Size: | 15.724 MB | 
| Industries: | Marine | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Feb-1993 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 28.7% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 66.1% average improvement on 2 Mercedes Genset engines via Wear Metals testing 26.6% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Wear Metals testing | 
Result 49 of 78
| Test Id: | 48 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | KCGM Super Pit | 
| File Size: | 0.187 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2003 | 
| Test Date: | 19-Jul-2003 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 50 of 78
| Test Id: | 74 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Kyle Railroad   | 
| File Size: | 22.532 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 6-Dec-1995 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Jun-1995 | 
| Test Location: | Kansas, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% average improvement on 9 GE U30C-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.1% average improvement on 17 GE U30C-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 51 of 78
| Test Id: | 179 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Kyle Railroad Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 1.517 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 4-Jun-1997 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Kansas, USA | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 52 of 78
| Test Id: | 68 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | M.S.Conus | 
| File Size: | 3.148 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler, Marine | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 | 
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing | 
Result 53 of 78
| Test Id: | 46 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Marandoo Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.223 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2003 | 
| Test Date: | 13-May-2003 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.6% average improvement on 2 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 25.0% average improvement on 3 Unit Rig 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 54 of 78
| Test Id: | 29 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Mid Florida Mining | 
| File Size: | 2.846 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 22-Jul-1991 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1991 | 
| Test Location: | Florida, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 14.4% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 38.1% improvement on a Boiler engine via CO testing | 
Result 55 of 78
| Test Id: | 128 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Motor Magazine | 
| File Size: | 0.295 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 1-May-2008 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 56 of 78
| Test Id: | 35 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Mt. Keith Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.235 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-2005 | 
| Test Date: | 26-Jul-2005 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 793C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 26.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 793C engine via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 57 of 78
| Test Id: | 36 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Mt. Whaleback Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.147 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Feb-2002 | 
| Test Date: | 18-Dec-2001 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 789 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 58 of 78
| Test Id: | 180 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Neff Trucking Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.699 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 30-Jun-1989 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Ohio, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% improvement on a Mack 300 engine via Statistical testing | 
Result 59 of 78
| Test Id: | 66 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Neptune Marine | 
| File Size: | 1.232 MB | 
| Industries: | Marine | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 1-May-1988 | 
| Test Date: | 6-Apr-1985 | 
| Test Location: | Singapore, China | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% improvement on a Pielstick 8PC4-2L-570 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 60 of 78
| Test Id: | 124 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | NewsCaster | 
| File Size: | 2.593 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 17-Dec-1997 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 61 of 78
| Test Id: | 22 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Norfolk Southern   | 
| File Size: | 9.840 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 62 of 78
| Test Id: | 64 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | North Flinders   | 
| File Size: | 0.165 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1989 | 
| Test Date: | 6-May-1989 | 
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing 3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing 54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 63 of 78
| Test Id: | 37 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Norwich Park Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.187 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Feb-1990 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Oct-1989 | 
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 27.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 12.6% average improvement on 7 Caterpillar 777D engines via Oil Consumption testing 44.0% average improvement on 12 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Oil Consumption testing 33.0% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Wear Metals testing | 
Result 64 of 78
| Test Id: | 53 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Occidental Chemical | 
| File Size: | 0.038 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Florida, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing | 
Result 65 of 78
| Test Id: | 54 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Osborne Mines | 
| File Size: | 27.664 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Jul-2000 | 
| Test Date: | 7-Jun-2000 | 
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.3% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 12V32E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 66 of 78
| Test Id: | 75 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Pacific National RR | 
| File Size: | 0.257 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Oct-2009 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Oct-2009 | 
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia | 
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 46.5% average improvement on 4 EMD GT46CWM engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 67 of 78
| Test Id: | 56 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Paddington | 
| File Size: | 0.099 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-May-2005 | 
| Test Date: | 21-Mar-2005 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.3% average improvement on 8 Caterpillar 777D engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 68 of 78
| Test Id: | 182 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Provo Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.802 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline | 
| Report Date: | 13-Nov-1997 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 69 of 78
| Test Id: | 125 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Railway Age | 
| File Size: | 2.208 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1997 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 70 of 78
| Test Id: | 122 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Residential Boiler | 
| File Size: | 0.027 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 1D Diesel (Kerosene) | 
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.0% average improvement on 2 Amer.Furnace M 175-C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 12.4% improvement on a Carrier 38M-105K401 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 3.1% improvement on a Crane MP-1192 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 1.6% improvement on a Hallmark engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 71 of 78
| Test Id: | 196 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Sadler | 
| File Size: | 0.177 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing | 
Result 72 of 78
| Test Id: | 47 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Smoky Canyon Mine | 
| File Size: | 7.162 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 2-Sep-1993 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing 9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing 7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 73 of 78
| Test Id: | 183 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Stein Distributing Company | 
| File Size: | 0.603 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 24-Nov-1993 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 74 of 78
| Test Id: | 169 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Summary of Wear Metals Smoky Canyon Mine | 
| File Size: | 25.929 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 9-May-1994 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Jul-1992 | 
| Test Location: | Wyoming, USA | 
| Summary: | Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 37.1% average improvement on 10 Caterpillar 785 engines via Wear Metals testing | 
Result 75 of 78
| Test Id: | 52 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Telfer Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.063 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1998 | 
| Test Date: | 16-Nov-1998 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 785B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 76 of 78
| Test Id: | 126 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | The Daily Herald | 
| File Size: | 5.762 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1995 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 77 of 78
| Test Id: | 127 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | The Plus Factor | 
| File Size: | 2.690 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler, Generators, Mining, Railroad, Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Publication | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2008 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. | 
Result 78 of 78
| Test Id: | 60 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Thiess Contractors | 
| File Size: | 0.177 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-2001 | 
| Test Date: | 15-Nov-2001 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 785C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 79 of 78
| Test Id: | 199 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Three Rivers Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.035 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing | 
Result 80 of 78
| Test Id: | 184 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Traco Testimonial | 
| File Size: | 0.648 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing | 
Result 81 of 78
| Test Id: | 30 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Triangle Gas Company | 
| File Size: | 26.224 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 28-May-1987 | 
| Test Date: | 17-Apr-1987 | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via CO2 testing 12.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via CO2 testing | 
Result 82 of 78
| Test Id: | 76 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | US Steel | 
| File Size: | 8.190 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 10-Oct-1988 | 
| Test Date: | 30-Aug-1988 | 
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 41.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing | 
Result 83 of 78
| Test Id: | 21 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp | 
| File Size: | 39.809 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining, Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 29-Apr-1992 | 
| Test Date: | 21-Jun-1991 | 
| Test Location: | Utah, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing 0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing -10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing | 
Result 84 of 78
| Test Id: | 117 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Wal-Mart | 
| File Size: | 34.933 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 6-Mar-1995 | 
| Test Date: | 1-Mar-1995 | 
| Test Location: | Arkansas, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -42.2% average improvement on 3 Detroit S-60 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via CO2 testing -2.4% average improvement on 4 Detroit S-60 engines via HC testing | 
Result 85 of 78
| Test Id: | 38 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Wesfarmers Coal | 
| File Size: | 0.176 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2001 | 
| Test Date: | 3-Jul-2001 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Komatsu 149 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.3% average improvement on 3 Euclid 4000 engines via Smoke Spot testing 8.0% average improvement on 2 Komatsu 149 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 86 of 78
| Test Id: | 3 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Wisconsin Central | 
| File Size: | 53.768 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 19-Aug-1996 | 
| Test Date: | 14-Aug-1996 | 
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.6% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.9% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO testing 1.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing 5.2% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 8.4% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engine via CO2 testing -18.5% average improvement on 7 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via HC testing 10.2% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via HC testing 17.8% average improvement on 10 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 27.5% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing 22.0% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
Result 87 of 78
| Test Id: | 4 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Wisconsin Central 2 | 
| File Size: | 6.093 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Oct-1996 | 
| Test Date: | 29-May-1996 | 
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.0% average improvement on 4 EMD 645E engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 4.6% improvement on a EMD SD45 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing | 
Result 88 of 78
| Test Id: | 62 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Worsley Alumina | 
| File Size: | 0.101 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-2004 | 
| Test Date: | 23-Jul-2003 | 
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 4 Komatsu 985 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.2% average improvement on 5 Komatsu 985 engines via Smoke Spot testing | 
| Show previous 10 documents | 
