Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 82 documents that match your query. These 82 documents contain a total of 1,852 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 32 locations
- 7 different industries
- 4 different fuel types
- 35 different engine manufacturers
- 114 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 46 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.652%
- 422 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.137%
- 11 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.600%
- 215 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.273%
- 16 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.484%
- 367 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.864%
- 406 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.562%
- 369 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.652%
Result 1 of 82
| Test Id: | 8 |
|---|---|
| Title: | A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine |
| File Size: | 33.744 MB |
| Industries: | Mining, Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
| Test Date: | 17-Apr-1994 |
| Test Location: | West Virginia, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing -1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing 11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing 11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing 29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing 91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing 22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing 57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 2 of 82
| Test Id: | 146 |
|---|---|
| Title: | AgipPetroli |
| File Size: | 3.862 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Rome, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 14.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via CO testing 33.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via HC testing |
Result 3 of 82
| Test Id: | 69 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Alaska Railroad Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 72.735 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Nov-1995 |
| Test Date: | 16-Sep-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing -13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 4 of 82
| Test Id: | 78 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Andhra Pradesh |
| File Size: | 9.721 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 28-Oct-1994 |
| Test Location: | Andhra Pradesh, India |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing 9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing 10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing 18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing 50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 5 of 82
| Test Id: | 70 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel |
| File Size: | 16.072 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Jul-1985 |
| Test Date: | 20-Feb-1985 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 6 of 82
| Test Id: | 79 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BEC-allwaste |
| File Size: | 22.693 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Sep-1996 |
| Test Date: | 10-Jul-1996 |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing 0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing -3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing 17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing -1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing 14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing 11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing 10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing 14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing 42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing 29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing 19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing 29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing 36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 7 of 82
| Test Id: | 14 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station |
| File Size: | 13.352 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1992 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing -45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing -10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing 7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing 38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 8 of 82
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 9 of 82
| Test Id: | 27 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Cascade Corporation |
| File Size: | 12.213 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 3-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing |
Result 10 of 82
| Test Id: | 81 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Urban Stages |
| File Size: | 6.812 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing 5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing -2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing 52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing 0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |