FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 8 documents that match your query. These 8 documents contain a total of 87 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 1 of 8

Test Id: 187
Title: Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway
File Size: 26.822 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2000
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing
43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing
11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 2 of 8

Test Id: 28
Title: EPA Exhaust Emissions
File Size: 7.937 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: Gasoline
Report Date: 12-Aug-1981
Test Date: 17-Jun-1981
Test Location: Colorado, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.2% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.3% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.1% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via CO testing
27.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via CO testing
21.4% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via HC testing
-4.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via HC testing
-3.3% average improvement on 3 Oldsmobile V-6 engines via NOx testing
7.8% average improvement on 3 Plymouth I-4 (104) engines via NOx testing

Result 3 of 8

Test Id: 68
Title: M.S.Conus
File Size: 3.148 MB
Industries: Boiler, Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1985
Test Date: 1-Sep-1984
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing
3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing
35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing
1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing

Result 4 of 8

Test Id: 136
Title: Rio Tinto UWA Thesis
File Size: 3.684 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Nov-2005
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
-6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
-9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing
9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing

Result 5 of 8

Test Id: 204
Title: Southwest Research EPA Emissions
File Size: 2.017 MB
Industries:
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions
Fuels: Gasoline
Report Date: 1-Jun-1997
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
18.8% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via CO testing
7.6% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via HC testing
9.9% average improvement on 2 1995 SWRI Test Engine engines via NOx testing

Result 6 of 8

Test Id: 172
Title: Southwest Research Locomotive Emissions NOx
File Size: 1.935 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Oct-1994
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Engine Emissions Results:
24.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SD40-2 engines via NOx testing
24.0% improvement on a GE C40-8 engine via NOx testing

Result 7 of 8

Test Id: 171
Title: Southwest Research RP-503
File Size: 0.353 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jul-1992
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.7% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
6.5% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via CO testing
4.6% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via HC testing
-3.8% improvement on a EMD 12-645E3B engine via NOx testing
Notes: This test was conducted on a clean, new EMD 12-645E3B.

Result 8 of 8

Test Id: 135
Title: System Controls
File Size: 4.432 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: Gasoline
Report Date: 28-May-1982
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: California, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 4 Chevrolet V8 engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.1% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via CO testing
1.3% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via HC testing
-2.0% improvement on a Chevrolet V8 engine via NOx testing