Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 64 documents that match your query. These 64 documents contain a total of 946 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 23 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 21 different engine manufacturers
- 68 different engine types
- 8 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 30 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.614%
- 268 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.348%
- 23 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.157%
- 79 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.124%
- 1 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of -2.000%
- 169 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.296%
- 167 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 1.855%
- 209 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.086%
Result 1 of 64
| Test Id: | 170 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel Testimonial |
| File Size: | 1.054 MB |
| Industries: | Buses, Railroad, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 24-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 2 of 64
| Test Id: | 174 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Basil Read |
| File Size: | 0.721 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Dec-1995 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Natal, India |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 15.4% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 3 of 64
| Test Id: | 79 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BEC-allwaste |
| File Size: | 22.693 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 15-Sep-1996 |
| Test Date: | 10-Jul-1996 |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing 0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing -3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing 17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing -1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing 13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing 14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing 11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing 10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing 9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing 14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing 42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing 29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing 19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing 29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing 36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing 20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 4 of 64
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 5 of 64
| Test Id: | 27 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Cascade Corporation |
| File Size: | 12.213 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 3-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing |
Result 6 of 64
| Test Id: | 82 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Brambles Trucking |
| File Size: | 0.488 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Feb-1992 |
| Test Date: | 14-Nov-1991 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing 23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing 20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 7 of 64
| Test Id: | 84 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Charley Brothers |
| File Size: | 14.550 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jul-1989 |
| Test Date: | 13-Apr-1989 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.8% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 1.6% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing -69.5% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via HC testing -85.7% improvement on a Navistar 444 engine via HC testing |
Result 8 of 64
| Test Id: | 141 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Chizek Trucking |
| File Size: | 0.183 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Mar-2003 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Wisconsin, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.3% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 9 of 64
| Test Id: | 86 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Boise |
| File Size: | 5.064 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.4% improvement on a Cummins 270 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.2% improvement on a Cummins 330 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Mack 300 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.3% improvement on a Cummins 330 engine via HC testing |
Result 10 of 64
| Test Id: | 88 |
|---|---|
| Title: | City of Southaven |
| File Size: | 0.774 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 28-Dec-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Mississippi, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.1% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.7% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -45.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO testing 92.7% average improvement on 2 Isuzu Pickup engines via CO testing 14.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO2 testing 7.1% improvement on a Ford Ambulance engine via CO2 testing -1.1% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via CO2 testing -21.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing 60.1% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via HC testing 22.4% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via HC testing 58.9% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via HC testing |
| Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |