Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 5 documents that match your query. These 5 documents contain a total of 42 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 7 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 9 different engine manufacturers
- 12 different engine types
- 8 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 6 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.363%
- 5 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.696%
- 3 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 29.490%
- 3 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 1.777%
- 7 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 23.714%
- 7 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.319%
- 7 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.654%
- 4 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 46.350%
Result 1 of 5
| Test Id: | 17 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans |
| File Size: | 5.262 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 2 of 5
| Test Id: | 18 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Devall Diesel |
| File Size: | 5.236 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 |
| Test Date: | 5-Jun-2000 |
| Test Location: | Louisiana, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing 22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing -28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing 31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 3 of 5
| Test Id: | 155 |
|---|---|
| Title: | K.D. Perdana |
| File Size: | 15.724 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-Feb-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Engine Emissions Results: 28.7% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Smoke Spot testing Engine Life/Maintenance Results: 66.1% average improvement on 2 Mercedes Genset engines via Wear Metals testing 26.6% average improvement on 2 MTU 16V engines via Wear Metals testing |
Result 4 of 5
| Test Id: | 68 |
|---|---|
| Title: | M.S.Conus |
| File Size: | 3.148 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing |
Result 5 of 5
| Test Id: | 66 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Neptune Marine |
| File Size: | 1.232 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-1988 |
| Test Date: | 6-Apr-1985 |
| Test Location: | Singapore, China |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% improvement on a Pielstick 8PC4-2L-570 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |