Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 78 documents that match your query. These 78 documents contain a total of 780 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 48 locations
- 7 different industries
- 5 different fuel types
- 52 different engine manufacturers
- 185 different engine types
- 12 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 61 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.498%
- 188 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.451%
- 14 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.980%
- 144 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.475%
- 4 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.583%
- 97 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.676%
- 93 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of -0.135%
- 114 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.326%
- 37 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 31.189%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 9 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -6.067%
Result 1 of 78
| Test Id: | 145 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Adams Industrial Sales |
| File Size: | 4.998 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emission credit, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 14-Jun-1983 |
| Test Date: | 19-Apr-1983 |
| Test Location: | North Carolina, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.5% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 2 of 78
| Test Id: | 69 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Alaska Railroad Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 72.735 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Nov-1995 |
| Test Date: | 16-Sep-1995 |
| Test Location: | Alaska, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing 5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing -13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing 24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 3 of 78
| Test Id: | 203 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Amatola Bus Fleet Testimonial |
| File Size: | 0.538 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 17-Jan-1996 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | England, England |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.8% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 4 of 78
| Test Id: | 70 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel |
| File Size: | 16.072 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 30-Jul-1985 |
| Test Date: | 20-Feb-1985 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 5 of 78
| Test Id: | 170 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Armco Steel Testimonial |
| File Size: | 1.054 MB |
| Industries: | Buses, Railroad, Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | |
| Report Date: | 24-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 6 of 78
| Test Id: | 71 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Australia Railroad Group (ARG) |
| File Size: | 4.805 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2006 |
| Test Date: | 12-Jun-2006 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 4 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing |
Result 7 of 78
| Test Id: | 149 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Azienda Perugina Delia Mobilita |
| File Size: | 4.773 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Sep-1998 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1997 |
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.0% improvement on a IVECO Bus engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 8 of 78
| Test Id: | 193 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Azienda Perugina della Mobilita Testimonial |
| File Size: | 0.015 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Sep-1998 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Perugia, Italy |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.7% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing |
Result 9 of 78
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 10 of 78
| Test Id: | 39 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Big Bell Mine |
| File Size: | 0.051 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1999 |
| Test Date: | 16-Aug-1999 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |