FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 83 documents that match your query. These 83 documents contain a total of 1,792 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 1 of 83

Test Id: 8
Title: A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine
File Size: 33.744 MB
Industries: Mining, Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 17-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing
-1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing
11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing
11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing
29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing
91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing
22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing
57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 2 of 83

Test Id: 146
Title: AgipPetroli
File Size: 3.862 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Rome, Italy
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
14.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via CO testing
33.0% improvement on a Ducato 14-2.5 D engine via HC testing

Result 3 of 83

Test Id: 69
Title: Alaska Railroad Corporation
File Size: 72.735 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Nov-1995
Test Date: 16-Sep-1995
Test Location: Alaska, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing
5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing
-13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing
24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 4 of 83

Test Id: 78
Title: Andhra Pradesh
File Size: 9.721 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Oct-1994
Test Date: 28-Oct-1994
Test Location: Andhra Pradesh, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing
9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing
10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing
18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing
7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing
0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 5 of 83

Test Id: 70
Title: Armco Steel
File Size: 16.072 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Jul-1985
Test Date: 20-Feb-1985
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing
8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing
41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing

Result 6 of 83

Test Id: 79
Title: BEC-allwaste
File Size: 22.693 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 15-Sep-1996
Test Date: 10-Jul-1996
Test Location: Alabama, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing
0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing
-3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing
17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing
-1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing
13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing
14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing
11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing
10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing
9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing
14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing
42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing
29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing
19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing
29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing
36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing
20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 7 of 83

Test Id: 14
Title: Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station
File Size: 13.352 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1992
Test Date: 25-Oct-1992
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing
-45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
-10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing
7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing
38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 8 of 83

Test Id: 80
Title: BFI Holding
File Size: 16.594 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 18-Nov-1994
Test Date: 7-Sep-1994
Test Location: Duiven, Netherlands
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing
1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing
32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing
24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing
19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing
35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing
26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing
26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing
1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing
12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing
9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing
8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing
9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing
8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing
-7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing
1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing
23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing
-24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing
4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing
10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing
0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing
3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing
0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing
4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing
14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing
12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing
12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing
-14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing
15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing
45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing
28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 9 of 83

Test Id: 27
Title: Boise Cascade Corporation
File Size: 12.213 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Aug-1993
Test Date: 3-Aug-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing
9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing
11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing
10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing
-0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing
-0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing
-6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing
-19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing
-39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing

Result 10 of 83

Test Id: 81
Title: Boise Urban Stages
File Size: 6.812 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Aug-1993
Test Date: 1-Aug-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing
5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing
-2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing
52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing
0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing
33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing
Show all documents on one page Show next 10 documents