Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 5 documents that match your query. These 5 documents contain a total of 44 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 4 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 5 different engine manufacturers
- 7 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 11 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.005%
- 5 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.516%
- 4 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 38.825%
- 3 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 1.777%
- 7 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 18.113%
- 7 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 15.226%
- 7 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.109%
Result 1 of 5
| Test Id: | 17 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans |
| File Size: | 5.262 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 2 of 5
| Test Id: | 68 |
|---|---|
| Title: | M.S.Conus |
| File Size: | 3.148 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler, Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1985 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1984 |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing 3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing 35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing 1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing |
Result 3 of 5
| Test Id: | 67 |
|---|---|
| Title: | MT Nivosa |
| File Size: | 0.054 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 11-Nov-1986 |
| Test Date: | 1-Apr-1986 |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.1% improvement on a Sulzer 6 RTA 76 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 4 of 5
| Test Id: | 66 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Neptune Marine |
| File Size: | 1.232 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-1988 |
| Test Date: | 6-Apr-1985 |
| Test Location: | Singapore, China |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.0% improvement on a Pielstick 8PC4-2L-570 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 5 of 5
| Test Id: | 222 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Royal Caribbean |
| File Size: | 4.725 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 14-May-2012 |
| Test Date: | 8-Apr-2012 |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing 4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing 20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing 38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing |